mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Demonstrating and Reducing Shortcuts in Vision-Language Representation Learning

arXiv 2402.17510 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 14

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) mainly rely on contrastive training to learn general-purpose representations of images and captions. We focus on the situation when one image is associated with several captions, each caption containing both information shared among all captions and unique information per caption about the scene depicted in the image. In such cases, it is unclear whether contrastive losses are sufficient for learning task-optimal representations that contain all the information provided by the captions or whether the contrastive learning setup encourages the learning of a simple shortcut that minimizes contrastive loss. We introduce synthetic shortcuts for vision-language: a training and evaluation framework where we inject synthetic shortcuts into image-text data. We show that contrastive VLMs trained from scratch or fine-tuned with data containing these synthetic shortcuts mainly learn features that represent the shortcut. Hence, contrastive losses are not sufficient to learn task-optimal representations, i.e., representations that contain all task-relevant information shared between the image and associated captions. We examine two methods to reduce shortcut learning in our training and evaluation framework: (i) latent target decoding and (ii) implicit feature modification. We show empirically that both methods improve performance on the evaluation task, but only partly reduce shortcut learning when training and evaluating with our shortcut learning framework. Hence, we show the difficulty and challenge of our shortcut learning framework for contrastive vision-language representation learning.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 60 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2024.

Builds on

60 of 75 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Image Captioners Are Scalable Vision Learners Too13 Jun
  2. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?4 Oct

Other references · 58

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  6. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  7. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  8. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  9. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  10. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  11. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  12. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
38 more
  1. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  2. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  3. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  4. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  5. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,612
  6. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
  7. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
  8. 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,297
  9. 2019VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Languagecited by 1,291
  10. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
  11. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,213
  12. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,013
  13. 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,004
  14. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
  15. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  16. 2019VL-BERT: Pre-training of Generic Visual-Linguistic Representationscited by 954
  17. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
  18. 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 802
  19. 2019Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Viewscited by 733
  20. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 626
  21. 2019Unicoder-VL: A Universal Encoder for Vision and Language by Cross-modal Pre-trainingcited by 451
  22. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
  23. 2021VLMo: Unified Vision-Language Pre-Training with Mixture-of-Modality-Expertscited by 424
  24. 2018Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 414
  25. 2021Supervision Exists Everywhere: A Data Efficient Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training Paradigmcited by 405
  26. 2019On Mutual Information Maximization for Representation Learningcited by 315
  27. 2021Multi-Grained Vision Language Pre-Training: Aligning Texts with Visual Conceptscited by 255
  28. 2020What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learningcited by 224
  29. 2014Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Modelscited by 197
  30. 2020Learning Robust Representations via Multi-View Information Bottleneckcited by 189
  31. 2019Visual Semantic Reasoning for Image-Text Matchingcited by 185
  32. 2021A Fine-Grained Analysis on Distribution Shiftcited by 171
  33. 2020Intriguing Properties of Contrastive Lossescited by 129
  34. 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 125
  35. 2021Can contrastive learning avoid shortcut solutions?cited by 114
  36. 2019Fusion of Detected Objects in Text for Visual Question Answeringcited by 74
  37. 2023Factorized Contrastive Learning: Going Beyond Multi-view Redundancycited by 73
  38. 2023To Compress or Not to Compress- Self-Supervised Learning and Information Theory: A Reviewcited by 72

50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 6.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Sparse CLIP: Co-Optimizing Interpretability and Performance in Contrastive Learning
  2. 2023Improved baselines for vision-language pre-training
  3. 2024FFF: Fixing Flawed Foundations in contrastive pre-training results in very strong Vision-Language models
  4. 2022Vision-Language Intelligence: Tasks, Representation Learning, and Large Models
  5. 2023Revisiting the Role of Language Priors in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2023Text encoders bottleneck compositionality in contrastive vision-language models
  7. 2021SimVLM: Simple Visual Language Model Pretraining with Weak Supervision
  8. 2022Unifying Vision-Language Representation Space with Single-tower Transformer