Shortcut Learning Susceptibility in Vision Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Shortcut learning, where machine learning models exploit spurious correlations in data instead of capturing meaningful features, poses a significant challenge to building robust and generalizable models. This phenomenon is prevalent across various machine learning applications, including vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition, where models may find unintended cues that minimize training loss but fail to capture the underlying structure of the data. Vision classifiers based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs), and Vision Transformers (ViTs) leverage distinct architectural principles to process spatial and structural information, making them differently susceptible to shortcut learning. In this study, we systematically evaluate these architectures by introducing deliberate shortcuts into the dataset that are correlated with class labels both positionally and via intensity, creating a controlled setup to assess whether models rely on these artificial cues or learn actual distinguishing features. We perform both quantitative evaluation by training on the shortcut-modified dataset and testing on two different test sets-one containing the same shortcuts and another without them-to determine the extent of reliance on shortcuts. Additionally, qualitative evaluation is performed using network inversion-based reconstruction techniques to analyze what the models internalize in their weights, aiming to reconstruct the training data as perceived by the classifiers. Further, we evaluate susceptibility to shortcut learning across different learning rates. Our analysis reveals that CNNs at lower learning rates tend to be more reserved against entirely picking up shortcut features, while ViTs, particularly those without positional encodings, almost entirely ignore the distinctive image features in the presence of shortcuts.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2025.
Builds on
13 of 15 references.
References · 13
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2022Reconstructing Training Data from Trained Neural Networkscited by 129
- 2023On the Foundations of Shortcut Learningcited by 64
- 2022Detecting Shortcut Learning for Fair Medical AI using Shortcut Testingcited by 52
- 2022Autoinverse: Uncertainty Aware Inversion of Neural Networkscited by 16
- 2024Shortcut Learning in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 16
- 2022Landscape Learning for Neural Network Inversioncited by 15
- 2022Rectify ViT Shortcut Learning by Visual Saliencycited by 14
- 2024Demonstrating and Reducing Shortcuts in Vision-Language Representation Learningcited by 14
- 2024Network Inversion of Binarised Neural Netscited by 11
- 2024Network Inversion of Convolutional Neural Netscited by 8
- 2023Reconstructing Training Data from Multiclass Neural Networkscited by 7
1 more
- 2024Network Inversion for Training-Like Data Reconstructioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026eXplaining to Learn (eX2L): Regularization Using Contrastive Visual Explanation Pairs for Distribution Shiftscited by 0
- 2026VEIL: How Visual Encoding Hijacking Induces Bias In Vision Modelscited by 0
- 2026Invisible Shortcuts: Why Vision Encoders Know Your Cameracited by 0
- 2026CCRV-Bench: Constraint-Based Evaluation of Causal Reasoning in Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026CCRV-Bench: Constraint-Based Evaluation of Causal Reasoning in Vision-Language Models25 Sep 2026
- 2026Invisible Shortcuts: Why Vision Encoders Know Your Camera5 Aug 2026
- 2026VEIL: How Visual Encoding Hijacking Induces Bias In Vision Models6 Jul 2026
- 2026eXplaining to Learn (eX2L): Regularization Using Contrastive Visual Explanation Pairs for Distribution Shifts7 May 2026