Procedural Adherence and Interpretability Through Neuro-Symbolic Generative Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
The surge in popularity of large language models (LLMs) has opened doors for new approaches to the creation of interactive agents. However, managing and interpreting the temporal behavior of such agents over the course of a potentially infinite interaction remain challenging. The stateful, long-term horizon reasoning required for coherent agent behavior does not fit well into the LLM paradigm. We propose a combination of formal logic-based program synthesis and LLM content generation to bring guarantees of procedural adherence and interpretability to generative agent behavior. To illustrate the benefit of procedural adherence and interpretability, we use Temporal Stream Logic (TSL) to generate an automaton that enforces an interpretable, high-level temporal structure on an agent. With the automaton tracking the context of the interaction and making decisions to guide the conversation accordingly, we can drive content generation in a way that allows the LLM to focus on a shorter context window. We evaluated our approach on different tasks involved in creating an interactive agent specialized for generating choose-your-own-adventure games. We found that over all of the tasks, an automaton-enhanced agent with procedural guarantees achieves at least 96% adherence to its temporal constraints, whereas a purely LLM-based agent demonstrates as low as 14.67% adherence.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 25 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2024.
Builds on
25 of 57 references.
References · 25
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
- 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
- 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 398
- 2023Larger language models do in-context learning differentlycited by 394
- 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 333
- 2023Reasoning on Graphs: Faithful and Interpretable Large Language Model Reasoningcited by 328
- 2019A Multiscale Visualization of Attention in the Transformer Modelcited by 292
13 more
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
- 2020Injecting Numerical Reasoning Skills into Language Modelscited by 133
- 2019Make Up Your Mind! Adversarial Generation of Inconsistent Natural Language Explanationscited by 71
- 2023Plug in the Safety Chip: Enforcing Constraints for LLM-driven Robot Agentscited by 69
- 2019Giving BERT a Calculator: Finding Operations and Arguments with Reading Comprehensioncited by 51
- 2021Consistent Counterfactuals for Deep Modelscited by 37
- 2019exBERT: A Visual Analysis Tool to Explore Learned Representations in Transformers Modelscited by 33
- 2023Prompt Sapper: A LLM-Empowered Production Tool for Building AI Chainscited by 24
- 2021Measuring and Improving BERT's Mathematical Abilities by Predicting the Order of Reasoningcited by 23
- 2023An Appraisal-Based Chain-Of-Emotion Architecture for Affective Language Model Game Agentscited by 15
- 2019CNM: An Interpretable Complex-valued Network for Matchingcited by 13
- 2021From Verification to Causality-based Explicationscited by 12
- 2023Three Questions Concerning the Use of Large Language Models to Facilitate Mathematics Learningcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2026Towards Verifiably Safe Tool Use for LLM Agentscited by 36
- 2025Towards Enforcing Company Policy Adherence in Agentic Workflowscited by 18
- 2024Guiding LLM Temporal Logic Generation with Explicit Separation of Data and Controlcited by 8
- 2025How GPT learns layer by layercited by 2
- 2024Branching Narratives: Character Decision Points Detectioncited by 1
- 2026Towards Verifiably Safe Tool Use for LLM Agents12 Jan 2026
- 2025Towards Enforcing Company Policy Adherence in Agentic Workflows22 Jul 2025
- 2025How GPT learns layer by layer13 Jan 2025
- 2024Guiding LLM Temporal Logic Generation with Explicit Separation of Data and Control11 Jun 2024
- 2024Branching Narratives: Character Decision Points Detection12 May 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026OdysseyArena: Benchmarking Large Language Models For Long-Horizon, Active and Inductive Interactions
- 2024AutoManual: Constructing Instruction Manuals by LLM Agents via Interactive Environmental Learning
- 2026From Actions to Understanding: Conformal Interpretability of Temporal Concepts in LLM Agents
- 2024A Survey on Large Language Model-Based Game Agents
- 2025PCGRLLM: Large Language Model-Driven Reward Design for Procedural Content Generation Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Verifiable Hidden Dynamics Play: Generating Agentic RL Environments from Solved Mechanisms
- 2025Towards Trustworthy Multi-Turn LLM Agents via Behavioral Guidance
- 2026The World Won't Wait: Evaluating and Teaching Agents Under a Live Clock