mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cost-Adaptive Recourse Recommendation by Adaptive Preference Elicitation

arXiv 2402.15073 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Algorithmic recourse recommends a cost-efficient action to a subject to reverse an unfavorable machine learning classification decision. Most existing methods in the literature generate recourse under the assumption of complete knowledge about the cost function. In real-world practice, subjects could have distinct preferences, leading to incomplete information about the underlying cost function of the subject. This paper proposes a two-step approach integrating preference learning into the recourse generation problem. In the first step, we design a question-answering framework to refine the confidence set of the Mahalanobis matrix cost of the subject sequentially. Then, we generate recourse by utilizing two methods: gradient-based and graph-based cost-adaptive recourse that ensures validity while considering the whole confidence set of the cost matrix. The numerical evaluation demonstrates the benefits of our approach over state-of-the-art baselines in delivering cost-efficient recourse recommendations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2024.

Builds on

21 of 41 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  2. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
  3. 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 501
  4. 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 328
  5. 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
  6. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 233
  7. 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
  8. 2019Learning Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Tabular Datacited by 146
  9. 2020Algorithmic recourse under imperfect causal knowledge: a probabilistic approachcited by 140
  10. 2021Counterfactual Explanations Can Be Manipulatedcited by 113
  11. 2021Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic Recoursecited by 102
  12. 2021CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithmscited by 86
9 more
  1. 2018GenAttack: Practical Black-box Attacks with Gradient-Free Optimizationcited by 82
  2. 2021Exploring Counterfactual Explanations Through the Lens of Adversarial Examples: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysiscited by 52
  3. 2021Amortized Generation of Sequential Algorithmic Recourses for Black-box Modelscited by 24
  4. 2019Synthesizing Action Sequences for Modifying Model Decisionscited by 22
  5. 2020Learning Models for Actionable Recoursecited by 18
  6. 2022Robust Bayesian Recoursecited by 18
  7. 2021Directive Explanations for Actionable Explainability in Machine Learning Applicationscited by 14
  8. 2021Low-Cost Algorithmic Recourse for Users With Uncertain Cost Functionscited by 10
  9. 2020Robust Active Preference Elicitationcited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.