mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Feature Accentuation: Revealing 'What' Features Respond to in Natural Images

arXiv 2402.10039 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2024cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Efforts to decode neural network vision models necessitate a comprehensive grasp of both the spatial and semantic facets governing feature responses within images. Most research has primarily centered around attribution methods, which provide explanations in the form of heatmaps, showing where the model directs its attention for a given feature. However, grasping 'where' alone falls short, as numerous studies have highlighted the limitations of those methods and the necessity to understand 'what' the model has recognized at the focal point of its attention. In parallel, 'Feature visualization' offers another avenue for interpreting neural network features. This approach synthesizes an optimal image through gradient ascent, providing clearer insights into 'what' features respond to. However, feature visualizations only provide one global explanation per feature; they do not explain why features activate for particular images. In this work, we introduce a new method to the interpretability tool-kit, 'feature accentuation', which is capable of conveying both where and what in arbitrary input images induces a feature's response. At its core, feature accentuation is image-seeded (rather than noise-seeded) feature visualization. We find a particular combination of parameterization, augmentation, and regularization yields naturalistic visualizations that resemble the seed image and target feature simultaneously. Furthermore, we validate these accentuations are processed along a natural circuit by the model. We make our precise implementation of feature accentuation available to the community as the Faccent library, an extension of Lucent.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2024.

Builds on

64 of 82 references.

References · 64

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  8. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  9. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  10. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  11. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  12. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
38 more
  1. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  2. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  3. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  4. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  5. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  6. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  7. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  8. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  9. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  10. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  11. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  12. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
  13. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  14. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  15. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
  16. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
  17. 2014Understanding Deep Image Representations by Inverting Themcited by 399
  18. 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 312
  19. 2015Explaining NonLinear Classification Decisions with Deep Taylor Decompositioncited by 248
  20. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 232
  21. 2019Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualizationcited by 189
  22. 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
  23. 2016Synthesizing the preferred inputs for neurons in neural networks via deep generator networkscited by 181
  24. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
  25. 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
  26. 2017Visualizing Deep Neural Network Decisions: Prediction Difference Analysiscited by 166
  27. 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 166
  28. 2020Axiom-based Grad-CAM: Towards Accurate Visualization and Explanation of CNNscited by 151
  29. 2016Multifaceted Feature Visualization: Uncovering the Different Types of Features Learned By Each Neuron in Deep Neural Networkscited by 106
  30. 2021HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanationscited by 105
  31. 2022Diffusion Visual Counterfactual Explanationscited by 96
  32. 2021The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scorescited by 87
  33. 2022What do Vision Transformers Learn? A Visual Explorationcited by 75
  34. 2020Adversarial Robustness on In- and Out-Distribution Improves Explainabilitycited by 73
  35. 2021Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysiscited by 65
  36. 2020There and Back Again: Revisiting Backpropagation Saliency Methodscited by 60
  37. 2020How Useful Are the Machine-Generated Interpretations to General Users? A Human Evaluation on Guessing the Incorrectly Predicted Labelscited by 39
  38. 2022Don't Lie to Me! Robust and Efficient Explainability with Verified Perturbation Analysiscited by 38

50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.