Bi-Orthogonal Factor Decomposition for Vision Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-attention is the central computational primitive of Vision Transformers, yet we lack a principled understanding of what information attention mechanisms exchange between tokens. Attention maps describe where weight mass concentrates; they do not reveal whether queries and keys trade position, content, or both. We introduce Bi-orthogonal Factor Decomposition (BFD), a two-stage analytical framework: first, an ANOVA-based decomposition statistically disentangles token activations into orthogonal positional and content factors; second, SVD of the query-key interaction matrix QK^T exposes bi-orthogonal modes that reveal how these factors mediate communication. After validating proper isolation of position and content, we apply BFD to state-of-the-art vision models and uncover three phenomena.(i) Attention operates primarily through content. Content-content interactions dominate attention energy, followed by content-position coupling. DINOv2 allocates more energy to content-position than supervised models and distributes computation across a richer mode spectrum. (ii) Attention mechanisms exhibit specialization: heads differentiate into content-content, content-position, and position-position operators, while singular modes within heads show analogous specialization. (iii) DINOv2's superior holistic shape processing emerges from intermediate layers that simultaneously preserve positional structure while contextually enriching semantic content. Overall, BFD exposes how tokens interact through attention and which informational factors - positional or semantic - mediate their communication, yielding practical insights into vision transformer mechanisms.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 74 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2026.
Builds on
74 of 93 references.
References · 74
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,423
38 more
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 999
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 871
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
- 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 694
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
- 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
- 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 419
- 2016RETAIN: An Interpretable Predictive Model for Healthcare using Reverse Time Attention Mechanismcited by 349
- 2023A Tale of Two Features: Stable Diffusion Complements DINO for Zero-Shot Semantic Correspondencecited by 301
- 2019On the Relationship between Self-Attention and Convolutional Layerscited by 300
- 2025Diffusion Transformers with Representation Autoencoderscited by 295
- 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 178
- 2023Getting aligned on representational alignmentcited by 143
- 2020The elephant in the interpretability room: Why use attention as explanation when we have saliency methods?cited by 122
- 2020Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectorscited by 120
- 2023The geometry of hidden representations of large transformer modelscited by 112
- 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 109
- 2021HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanationscited by 105
- 2021What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methodscited by 98
- 2019When Explanations Lie: Why Many Modified BP Attributions Failcited by 92
- 2023Getting ViT in Shape: Scaling Laws for Compute-Optimal Model Designcited by 89
- 2021The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scorescited by 88
- 2023Copy Suppression: Comprehensively Understanding an Attention Headcited by 76
- 2022Human alignment of neural network representationscited by 74
- 2021Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysiscited by 65
- 2022Harmonizing the object recognition strategies of deep neural networks with humanscited by 59
- 2021Neural population geometry: An approach for understanding biological and artificial neural networkscited by 52
- 2014Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognitioncited by 50
50 most cited of 74 All 74 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Arithmetic in the Wild: Llama uses Base-10 Addition to Reason About Cyclic Conceptscited by 10
- 2026Decomposing Query-Key Feature Interactions Using Contrastive Covariancescited by 3
- 2026What DINO saw: ALiBi positional encoding reduces positional bias in Vision Transformerscited by 1
- 2026Vision Transformer-Conditioned UNet for Domain-Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 0
- 2026Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation Facilitates Model Understandingcited by 0
- 2026Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation Facilitates Model Understanding28 May 2026
- 2026Vision Transformer-Conditioned UNet for Domain-Adaptive Semantic Segmentation12 May 2026
- 2026Arithmetic in the Wild: Llama uses Base-10 Addition to Reason About Cyclic Concepts1 May 2026
- 2026What DINO saw: ALiBi positional encoding reduces positional bias in Vision Transformers17 Mar 2026
- 2026Decomposing Query-Key Feature Interactions Using Contrastive Covariances4 Feb 2026