mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding Visual Feature Reliance through the Lens of Complexity

arXiv 2407.06076 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies suggest that deep learning models inductive bias towards favoring simpler features may be one of the sources of shortcut learning. Yet, there has been limited focus on understanding the complexity of the myriad features that models learn. In this work, we introduce a new metric for quantifying feature complexity, based on mathscrV-information and capturing whether a feature requires complex computational transformations to be extracted. Using this mathscrV-information metric, we analyze the complexities of 10,000 features, represented as directions in the penultimate layer, that were extracted from a standard ImageNet-trained vision model. Our study addresses four key questions: First, we ask what features look like as a function of complexity and find a spectrum of simple to complex features present within the model. Second, we ask when features are learned during training. We find that simpler features dominate early in training, and more complex features emerge gradually. Third, we investigate where within the network simple and complex features flow, and find that simpler features tend to bypass the visual hierarchy via residual connections. Fourth, we explore the connection between features complexity and their importance in driving the networks decision. We find that complex features tend to be less important. Surprisingly, important features become accessible at earlier layers during training, like a sedimentation process, allowing the model to build upon these foundational elements.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 72 of its 116 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2024.

Builds on

72 of 116 references.

References · 72

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  5. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  6. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  7. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  8. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  9. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  10. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  11. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
  12. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
38 more
  1. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  2. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
  3. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  4. 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,101
  5. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  6. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  7. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
  8. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
  9. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
  10. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
  11. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
  12. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  13. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
  14. 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 405
  15. 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 368
  16. 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 351
  17. 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 241
  18. 2022Patches Are All You Need?cited by 201
  19. 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 188
  20. 2018Deep learning generalizes because the parameter-function map is biased towards simple functionscited by 183
  21. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 178
  22. 2019What Do Compressed Deep Neural Networks Forget?cited by 171
  23. 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
  24. 2020A Theory of Usable Information Under Computational Constraintscited by 162
  25. 2021The Low-Rank Simplicity Bias in Deep Networkscited by 154
  26. 2022FlexiViT: One Model for All Patch Sizescited by 152
  27. 2022From Attribution Maps to Human-Understandable Explanations through Concept Relevance Propagationcited by 141
  28. 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 126
  29. 2020Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectorscited by 120
  30. 2021Salient ImageNet: How to discover spurious features in Deep Learning?cited by 114
  31. 2021Counterfactual Explanations Can Be Manipulatedcited by 113
  32. 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 109
  33. 2016Multifaceted Feature Visualization: Uncovering the Different Types of Features Learned By Each Neuron in Deep Neural Networkscited by 106
  34. 2021HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanationscited by 105
  35. 2021What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methodscited by 98
  36. 2023Compositional Abilities Emerge Multiplicatively: Exploring Diffusion Models on a Synthetic Taskcited by 93
  37. 2021The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scorescited by 88
  38. 2018The Description Length of Deep Learning Modelscited by 72

50 most cited of 72 All 72 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 11; 2026: 4.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: