mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Channel-Selective Normalization for Label-Shift Robust Test-Time Adaptation

arXiv 2402.04958 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2024cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks have useful applications in many different tasks, however their performance can be severely affected by changes in the data distribution. For example, in the biomedical field, their performance can be affected by changes in the data (different machines, populations) between training and test datasets. To ensure robustness and generalization to real-world scenarios, test-time adaptation has been recently studied as an approach to adjust models to a new data distribution during inference. Test-time batch normalization is a simple and popular method that achieved compelling performance on domain shift benchmarks. It is implemented by recalculating batch normalization statistics on test batches. Prior work has focused on analysis with test data that has the same label distribution as the training data. However, in many practical applications this technique is vulnerable to label distribution shifts, sometimes producing catastrophic failure. This presents a risk in applying test time adaptation methods in deployment. We propose to tackle this challenge by only selectively adapting channels in a deep network, minimizing drastic adaptation that is sensitive to label shifts. Our selection scheme is based on two principles that we empirically motivate: (1) later layers of networks are more sensitive to label shift (2) individual features can be sensitive to specific classes. We apply the proposed technique to three classification tasks, including CIFAR10-C, Imagenet-C, and diagnosis of fatty liver, where we explore both covariate and label distribution shifts. We find that our method allows to bring the benefits of TTA while significantly reducing the risk of failure common in other methods, while being robust to choice in hyperparameters.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2024.

Builds on

37 of 53 references.

References · 37

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  3. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  4. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  6. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  7. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
  8. 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,198
  9. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
  10. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
  11. 2022TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT imagescited by 613
  12. 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Studycited by 568
25 more
  1. 2016Weight Normalization: A Simple Reparameterization to Accelerate Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 543
  2. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
  3. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
  4. 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 366
  5. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 359
  6. 2018How Does Batch Normalization Help Optimization?cited by 357
  7. 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 288
  8. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
  9. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 236
  10. 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 189
  11. 2020Harmonizing Transferability and Discriminability for Adapting Object Detectorscited by 126
  12. 2018Greedy Layerwise Learning Can Scale to ImageNetcited by 115
  13. 2020Training BatchNorm and Only BatchNorm: On the Expressive Power of Random Features in CNNscited by 104
  14. 2023TTN: A Domain-Shift Aware Batch Normalization in Test-Time Adaptationcited by 101
  15. 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
  16. 2021SITA: Single Image Test-time Adaptationcited by 59
  17. 2022Pin the Memory: Learning to Generalize Semantic Segmentationcited by 49
  18. 2021MixNorm: Test-Time Adaptation Through Online Normalization Estimationcited by 47
  19. 2022Towards Online Domain Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 36
  20. 2022Few-shot Medical Image Segmentation with Cycle-resemblance Attentioncited by 33
  21. 2021Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation without Source Datacited by 30
  22. 2023Label Shift Adapter for Test-Time Adaptation under Covariate and Label Shiftscited by 21
  23. 2022Channel Importance Matters in Few-Shot Image Classificationcited by 20
  24. 2021Limitations of Post-Hoc Feature Alignment for Robustnesscited by 14
  25. 2017Building a Regular Decision Boundary with Deep Networkscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.