Test Time Adaptation Using Adaptive Quantile Recalibration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Domain adaptation is a key strategy for enhancing the generalizability of deep learning models in real-world scenarios, where test distributions often diverge significantly from the training domain. However, conventional approaches typically rely on prior knowledge of the target domain or require model retraining, limiting their practicality in dynamic or resource-constrained environments. Recent test-time adaptation methods based on batch normalization statistic updates allow for unsupervised adaptation, but they often fail to capture complex activation distributions and are constrained to specific normalization layers. We propose Adaptive Quantile Recalibration (AQR), a test-time adaptation technique that modifies pre-activation distributions by aligning quantiles on a channel-wise basis. AQR captures the full shape of activation distributions and generalizes across architectures employing BatchNorm, GroupNorm, or LayerNorm. To address the challenge of estimating distribution tails under varying batch sizes, AQR incorporates a robust tail calibration strategy that improves stability and precision. Our method leverages source-domain statistics computed at training time, enabling unsupervised adaptation without retraining models. Experiments on CIFAR-10-C, CIFAR-100-C, and ImageNet-C across multiple architectures demonstrate that AQR achieves robust adaptation across diverse settings, outperforming existing test-time adaptation baselines. These results highlight AQR's potential for deployment in real-world scenarios with dynamic and unpredictable data distributions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.
Builds on
18 of 25 references.
References · 18
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
- 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 359
- 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 288
- 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 236
- 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 189
- 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
- 2023TTN: A Domain-Shift Aware Batch Normalization in Test-Time Adaptationcited by 101
6 more
- 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
- 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Surveycited by 44
- 2023Test-Time Domain Adaptation by Learning Domain-Aware Batch Normalizationcited by 31
- 2024Channel-Selective Normalization for Label-Shift Robust Test-Time Adaptationcited by 3
- 2024Not Only the Last-Layer Features for Spurious Correlations: All Layer Deep Feature Reweightingcited by 3
- 2025FairDropout: Using Example-Tied Dropout to Enhance Generalization of Minority Groupscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.