mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Minimum Description Length and Generalization Guarantees for Representation Learning

arXiv 2402.03254 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2024stat.ML cs.IT cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A major challenge in designing efficient statistical supervised learning algorithms is finding representations that perform well not only on available training samples but also on unseen data. While the study of representation learning has spurred much interest, most existing such approaches are heuristic; and very little is known about theoretical generalization guarantees. In this paper, we establish a compressibility framework that allows us to derive upper bounds on the generalization error of a representation learning algorithm in terms of the "Minimum Description Length" (MDL) of the labels or the latent variables (representations). Rather than the mutual information between the encoder's input and the representation, which is often believed to reflect the algorithm's generalization capability in the related literature but in fact, falls short of doing so, our new bounds involve the "multi-letter" relative entropy between the distribution of the representations (or labels) of the training and test sets and a fixed prior. In particular, these new bounds reflect the structure of the encoder and are not vacuous for deterministic algorithms. Our compressibility approach, which is information-theoretic in nature, builds upon that of Blum-Langford for PAC-MDL bounds and introduces two essential ingredients: block-coding and lossy-compression. The latter allows our approach to subsume the so-called geometrical compressibility as a special case. To the best knowledge of the authors, the established generalization bounds are the first of their kind for Information Bottleneck (IB) type encoders and representation learning. Finally, we partly exploit the theoretical results by introducing a new data-dependent prior. Numerical simulations illustrate the advantages of well-chosen such priors over classical priors used in IB.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2024.

Builds on

37 of 71 references.

References · 37

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,650
  3. 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 915
  4. 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 494
  5. 2017A PAC-Bayesian Approach to Spectrally-Normalized Margin Bounds for Neural Networkscited by 309
  6. 2018Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approachcited by 306
  7. 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 299
  8. 2020Reasoning About Generalization via Conditional Mutual Informationcited by 145
  9. 2019Tightening Mutual Information Based Bounds on Generalization Errorcited by 117
  10. 2023How Does Information Bottleneck Help Deep Learning?cited by 92
  11. 2020The Conditional Entropy Bottleneckcited by 75
  12. 2017Nonlinear Information Bottleneckcited by 71
25 more
  1. 2018The Description Length of Deep Learning Modelscited by 71
  2. 2018Learning Representations for Neural Network-Based Classification Using the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 70
  3. 2020The Information Bottleneck Problem and Its Applications in Machine Learningcited by 66
  4. 2020Hausdorff Dimension, Heavy Tails, and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 62
  5. 2020Proper Learning, Helly Number, and an Optimal SVM Boundcited by 52
  6. 2021Information-theoretic generalization bounds for black-box learning algorithmscited by 49
  7. 2021Heavy Tails in SGD and Compressibility of Overparametrized Neural Networkscited by 44
  8. 2019Minimum Description Length Revisitedcited by 36
  9. 2020On Information Plane Analyses of Neural Network Classifiers -- A Reviewcited by 35
  10. 2018Caveats for information bottleneck in deterministic scenarioscited by 34
  11. 2021Generalization bounds via distillationcited by 33
  12. 2018Distributed Variational Representation Learningcited by 32
  13. 2019Universal Bayes consistency in metric spacescited by 32
  14. 2020Learning Optimal Representations with the Decodable Information Bottleneckcited by 32
  15. 2020Stable Sample Compression Schemes: New Applications and an Optimal SVM Margin Boundcited by 31
  16. 2021PAC-Bayes, MAC-Bayes and Conditional Mutual Information: Fast rate bounds that handle general VC classescited by 31
  17. 2020On the Information Bottleneck Problems: Models, Connections, Applications and Information Theoretic Viewscited by 28
  18. 2020On Random Subset Generalization Error Bounds and the Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics Algorithmcited by 28
  19. 2022A New Family of Generalization Bounds Using Samplewise Evaluated CMIcited by 28
  20. 2022Rate-Distortion Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Stochastic Learning Algorithmscited by 22
  21. 2018Sample Compression for Real-Valued Learnerscited by 19
  22. 2019The Convex Information Bottleneck Lagrangiancited by 16
  23. 2022Gacs-Korner Common Information Variational Autoencodercited by 12
  24. 2023Data-dependent Generalization Bounds via Variable-Size Compressibilitycited by 9
  25. 2023Recognizable Information Bottleneckcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 3.

11 papers.