mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interpretable by Design: Learning Predictors by Composing Interpretable Queries

arXiv 2207.00938 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is a growing concern about typically opaque decision-making with high-performance machine learning algorithms. Providing an explanation of the reasoning process in domain-specific terms can be crucial for adoption in risk-sensitive domains such as healthcare. We argue that machine learning algorithms should be interpretable by design and that the language in which these interpretations are expressed should be domain- and task-dependent. Consequently, we base our model's prediction on a family of user-defined and task-specific binary functions of the data, each having a clear interpretation to the end-user. We then minimize the expected number of queries needed for accurate prediction on any given input. As the solution is generally intractable, following prior work, we choose the queries sequentially based on information gain. However, in contrast to previous work, we need not assume the queries are conditionally independent. Instead, we leverage a stochastic generative model (VAE) and an MCMC algorithm (Unadjusted Langevin) to select the most informative query about the input based on previous query-answers. This enables the online determination of a query chain of whatever depth is required to resolve prediction ambiguities. Finally, experiments on vision and NLP tasks demonstrate the efficacy of our approach and its superiority over post-hoc explanations.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 97 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2022.

Builds on

52 of 97 references.

References · 52

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  6. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  7. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  8. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  9. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  10. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  11. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  12. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
38 more
  1. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  2. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  3. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  4. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  5. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  6. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
  7. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  8. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  9. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
  10. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 415
  11. 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 375
  12. 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 369
  13. 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 364
  14. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 346
  15. 2014Recurrent Models of Visual Attentioncited by 344
  16. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
  17. 2016Hierarchical Question-Image Co-Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 278
  18. 2019On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 239
  19. 2017Distilling a Neural Network Into a Soft Decision Treecited by 230
  20. 2020Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 225
  21. 2020Compositional Explanations of Neuronscited by 172
  22. 2016High-dimensional Bayesian inference via the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithmcited by 144
  23. 2022Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual Featurescited by 136
  24. 2019Learning to Deceive with Attention-Based Explanationscited by 111
  25. 2019On the Anatomy of MCMC-Based Maximum Likelihood Learning of Energy-Based Modelscited by 105
  26. 2019Attention in Natural Language Processingcited by 100
  27. 2019Benchmarking Attribution Methods with Relative Feature Importancecited by 89
  28. 2015Where To Look: Focus Regions for Visual Question Answeringcited by 64
  29. 2021Convolutional Dynamic Alignment Networks for Interpretable Classificationscited by 54
  30. 2021Do Input Gradients Highlight Discriminative Features?cited by 52
  31. 2021Instance-Optimal Compressed Sensing via Posterior Samplingcited by 43
  32. 2019Saccader: Improving Accuracy of Hard Attention Models for Visioncited by 35
  33. 2019Optimizing for Interpretability in Deep Neural Networks with Tree Regularizationcited by 13
  34. 2021A Rate-Distortion Framework for Explaining Black-box Model Decisionscited by 11
  35. 2018Visual Question Answering as Reading Comprehensioncited by 8
  36. 2016Ask Your Neurons: A Deep Learning Approach to Visual Question Answeringcited by 7
  37. 2021When are Deep Networks really better than Decision Forests at small sample sizes, and how?cited by 6
  38. 2020Noisy Adaptive Group Testing using Bayesian Sequential Experimental Designcited by 4

50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 8; 2024: 4; 2025: 9; 2026: 5.

26 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Learning to Maximize Mutual Information for Dynamic Feature Selectioncited by 54
  2. 2024The Probabilities Also Matter: A More Faithful Metric for Faithfulness of Free-Text Explanations in Large Language Modelscited by 29
  3. 2023Variational Information Pursuit for Interpretable Predictionscited by 25
  4. 2024Stochastic Amortization: A Unified Approach to Accelerate Feature and Data Attributioncited by 21
  5. 2023Estimating Conditional Mutual Information for Dynamic Feature Selectioncited by 20
  6. 2025A Survey on Active Feature Acquisition Strategiescited by 16
  7. 2026Uncertainty Quantification in LLM Agents: Foundations, Emerging Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 15
  8. 2024Towards a theory of model distillationcited by 14
  9. 2025Object Centric Concept Bottleneckscited by 10
  10. 2025Stochastic Encodings for Active Feature Acquisitioncited by 8
  11. 20233VL: Using Trees to Improve Vision-Language Models' Interpretabilitycited by 7
  12. 2024Evidential Concept Embedding Models: Towards Reliable Concept Explanations for Skin Disease Diagnosiscited by 7
14 more
  1. 2025Conformal Information Pursuit for Interactively Guiding Large Language Modelscited by 7
  2. 2023Learning Interpretable Queries for Explainable Image Classification with Information Pursuitcited by 5
  3. 2025Learning-To-Measure: In-Context Active Feature Acquisitioncited by 4
  4. 2023Contextual Knowledge Pursuit for Faithful Visual Synthesiscited by 2
  5. 2025IP-CRR: Information Pursuit for Interpretable Classification of Chest Radiology Reportscited by 2
  6. 2025Dynamic Feature Selection from Variable Feature Sets Using Features of Featurescited by 1
  7. 2023Hardness of Deceptive Certificate Selectioncited by 0
  8. 2023Variational Information Pursuit with Large Language and Multimodal Models for Interpretable Predictionscited by 0
  9. 2025Enhancing Performance of Explainable AI Models with Constrained Concept Refinementcited by 0
  10. 2025Uncertainty-Aware Information Pursuit for Interpretable and Reliable Medical Image Analysiscited by 0
  11. 2026When Can We Trust Deep Neural Networks? Towards Reliable Industrial Deployment with an Interpretability Guidecited by 0
  12. 2026ProtoPathway: Biologically Structured Prototype-Pathway Fusion for Multimodal Cancer Survival Predictioncited by 0
  13. 2026In Defense of Information Leakage in Concept-based Modelscited by 0
  14. 2026Explanations-Driven Active Feature Acquisition for Algorithmic Recoursecited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Rethinking Explainable Disease Prediction: Synergizing Accuracy and Reliability via Reflective Cognitive Architecture
  2. 2025Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): from inherent explainability to large language models
  3. 2024Intrinsic User-Centric Interpretability through Global Mixture of Experts
  4. 2026Retrieval-Augmented Interpretable Learning: Towards Task-Specific Zero-Shot Models in Healthcare
  5. 2026From Stochastic Answers to Verifiable Reasoning: Interpretable Decision-Making with LLM-Generated Code
  6. 2025Towards the Formalization of a Trustworthy AI for Mining Interpretable Models explOiting Sophisticated Algorithms
  7. 2025No Black Boxes: Interpretable and Interactable Predictive Healthcare with Knowledge-Enhanced Agentic Causal Discovery
  8. 2024Critique of Impure Reason: Unveiling the reasoning behaviour of medical Large Language Models