Privacy-Preserving Distributed Learning for Residential Short-Term Load Forecasting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the realm of power systems, the increasing involvement of residential users in load forecasting applications has heightened concerns about data privacy. Specifically, the load data can inadvertently reveal the daily routines of residential users, thereby posing a risk to their property security. While federated learning (FL) has been employed to safeguard user privacy by enabling model training without the exchange of raw data, these FL models have shown vulnerabilities to emerging attack techniques, such as Deep Leakage from Gradients and poisoning attacks. To counteract these, we initially employ a Secure-Aggregation (SecAgg) algorithm that leverages multiparty computation cryptographic techniques to mitigate the risk of gradient leakage. However, the introduction of SecAgg necessitates the deployment of additional sub-center servers for executing the multiparty computation protocol, thereby escalating computational complexity and reducing system robustness, especially in scenarios where one or more sub-centers are unavailable. To address these challenges, we introduce a Markovian Switching-based distributed training framework, the convergence of which is substantiated through rigorous theoretical analysis. The Distributed Markovian Switching (DMS) topology shows strong robustness towards the poisoning attacks as well. Case studies employing real-world power system load data validate the efficacy of our proposed algorithm. It not only significantly minimizes communication complexity but also maintains accuracy levels comparable to traditional FL methods, thereby enhancing the scalability of our load forecasting algorithm.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2024.
Builds on
16 of 60 references.
References · 16
- 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,710
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
- 2021Towards Personalized Federated Learningcited by 462
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
- 2020Three Approaches for Personalization with Applications to Federated Learningcited by 321
- 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 288
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 266
- 2018Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learningcited by 219
- 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 208
- 2018D2: Decentralized Training over Decentralized Datacited by 140
4 more
- 2020Turbo-Aggregate: Breaking the Quadratic Aggregation Barrier in Secure Federated Learningcited by 78
- 2020Differentially Private Secure Multi-Party Computation for Federated Learning in Financial Applicationscited by 58
- 2021Federated Learning with Hyperparameter-based Clustering for Electrical Load Forecastingcited by 13
- 2020Evaluating the Communication Efficiency in Federated Learning Algorithmscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.