Evaluating the Communication Efficiency in Federated Learning Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the era of advanced technologies, mobile devices are equipped with computing and sensing capabilities that gather excessive amounts of data. These amounts of data are suitable for training different learning models. Cooperated with advancements in Deep Learning (DL), these learning models empower numerous useful applications, e.g., image processing, speech recognition, healthcare, vehicular network and many more. Traditionally, Machine Learning (ML) approaches require data to be centralised in cloud-based data-centres. However, this data is often large in quantity and privacy-sensitive which prevents logging into these data-centres for training the learning models. In turn, this results in critical issues of high latency and communication inefficiency. Recently, in light of new privacy legislations in many countries, the concept of Federated Learning (FL) has been introduced. In FL, mobile users are empowered to learn a global model by aggregating their local models, without sharing the privacy-sensitive data. Usually, these mobile users have slow network connections to the data-centre where the global model is maintained. Moreover, in a complex and large scale network, heterogeneous devices that have various energy constraints are involved. This raises the challenge of communication cost when implementing FL at large scale. To this end, in this research, we begin with the fundamentals of FL, and then, we highlight the recent FL algorithms and evaluate their communication efficiency with detailed comparisons. Furthermore, we propose a set of solutions to alleviate the existing FL problems both from communication perspective and privacy perspective.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 4.
9 papers.
- 2023Heterogeneous Federated Learning: State-of-the-art and Research Challengescited by 160
- 2021FedProc: Prototypical Contrastive Federated Learning on Non-IID datacited by 80
- 2021Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection System: Concepts, Challenges and Future Directionscited by 22
- 2024Non-IID data in Federated Learning: A Survey with Taxonomy, Metrics, Methods, Frameworks and Future Directionscited by 12
- 2021Self-supervised Cross-silo Federated Neural Architecture Searchcited by 11
- 2022Application of federated learning techniques for arrhythmia classification using 12-lead ECG signalscited by 9
- 2024Exploring the Practicality of Federated Learning: A Survey Towards the Communication Perspectivecited by 4
- 2024Privacy-Preserving Distributed Learning for Residential Short-Term Load Forecastingcited by 0
- 2024A cautionary tale on the cost-effectiveness of collaborative AI in real-world medical applicationscited by 0
- 2024A cautionary tale on the cost-effectiveness of collaborative AI in real-world medical applications9 Dec 2024
- 2024Non-IID data in Federated Learning: A Survey with Taxonomy, Metrics, Methods, Frameworks and Future Directions19 Nov 2024
- 2024Exploring the Practicality of Federated Learning: A Survey Towards the Communication Perspective30 May 2024
- 2024Privacy-Preserving Distributed Learning for Residential Short-Term Load Forecasting2 Feb 2024
- 2023Heterogeneous Federated Learning: State-of-the-art and Research Challenges20 Jul 2023
- 2022Application of federated learning techniques for arrhythmia classification using 12-lead ECG signals23 Aug 2022
- 2021FedProc: Prototypical Contrastive Federated Learning on Non-IID data25 Sep 2021
- 2021Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection System: Concepts, Challenges and Future Directions16 Jun 2021
- 2021Self-supervised Cross-silo Federated Neural Architecture Search28 Jan 2021