Who Wrote This Line? Evaluating the Detection of LLM-Generated Classical Chinese Poetry
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has extended text generation tasks into the literary domain. However, AI-generated literary creations has raised increasingly prominent issues of creative authenticity and ethics in literary world, making the detection of LLM-generated literary texts essential and urgent. While previous works have made significant progress in detecting AI-generated text, it has yet to address classical Chinese poetry. Due to the unique linguistic features of classical Chinese poetry, such as strict metrical regularity, a shared system of poetic imagery, and flexible syntax, distinguishing whether a poem is authored by AI presents a substantial challenge. To address these issues, we introduce ChangAn, a benchmark for detecting LLM-generated classical Chinese poetry that containing total 30,664 poems, 10,276 are human-written poems and 20,388 poems are generated by four popular LLMs. Based on ChangAn, we conducted a systematic evaluation of 12 AI detectors, investigating their performance variations across different text granularities and generation strategies. Our findings highlight the limitations of current Chinese text detectors, which fail to serve as reliable tools for detecting LLM-generated classical Chinese poetry. These results validate the effectiveness and necessity of our proposed ChangAn benchmark. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/VelikayaScarlet/ChangAn.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2026.
Builds on
21 of 54 references.
References · 21
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
- 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
- 2023Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 61
- 2025SWE-QA: Can Language Models Answer Repository-level Code Questions?cited by 38
- 2024Between Lines of Code: Unraveling the Distinct Patterns of Machine and Human Programmerscited by 27
- 2016Chinese Poetry Generation with Planning based Neural Networkcited by 22
- 2024CharPoet: A Chinese Classical Poetry Generation System Based on Token-free LLMcited by 18
9 more
- 2024Evaluating Diversity in Automatic Poetry Generationcited by 17
- 2016Generating Chinese Classical Poems with RNN Encoder-Decodercited by 16
- 2024What is the Best Way for ChatGPT to Translate Poetry?cited by 14
- 2024LLM-Detector: Improving AI-Generated Chinese Text Detection with Open-Source LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 10
- 2025Learning to Substitute Words with Model-based Score Rankingcited by 10
- 2025Benchmarking the Detection of LLMs-Generated Modern Chinese Poetrycited by 10
- 2026Can ChatGPT Really Understand Modern Chinese Poetry?cited by 4
- 2025Robust Preference Alignment via Directional Neighborhood Consensuscited by 2
- 2015On the evolution of word usage of classical Chinese poetrycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.