mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Machine Vision Iceberg Explained: Advancing Dynamic Testing by Considering Holistic Environmental Relations

arXiv 2401.14831 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2024cs.RO cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Vision (MV) is essential for solving driving automation. This paper examines potential shortcomings in current MV testing strategies for highly automated driving (HAD) systems. We argue for a more comprehensive understanding of the performance factors that must be considered during the MV evaluation process, noting that neglecting these factors can lead to significant risks. This is not only relevant to MV component testing, but also to integration testing. To illustrate this point, we draw an analogy to a ship navigating towards an iceberg to show potential hidden challenges in current MV testing strategies. The main contribution is a novel framework for black-box testing which observes environmental relations. This means it is designed to enhance MV assessments by considering the attributes and surroundings of relevant individual objects. The framework provides the identification of seven general concerns about the object recognition of MV, which are not addressed adequately in established test processes. To detect these deficits based on their performance factors, we propose the use of a taxonomy called "granularity orders" along with a graphical representation. This allows an identification of MV uncertainties across a range of driving scenarios. This approach aims to advance the precision, efficiency, and completeness of testing procedures for MV.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2024.

Builds on

17 of 42 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  2. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  3. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  4. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
  5. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  6. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  7. 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,064
  8. 2023LightGlue: Local Feature Matching at Light Speedcited by 583
  9. 2020Cylindrical and Asymmetrical 3D Convolution Networks for LiDAR Segmentationcited by 388
  10. 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
  11. 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
  12. 2017SqueezeSeg: Convolutional Neural Nets with Recurrent CRF for Real-Time Road-Object Segmentation from 3D LiDAR Point Cloudcited by 231
5 more
  1. 2021DetCo: Unsupervised Contrastive Learning for Object Detectioncited by 205
  2. 2019Imbalance Problems in Object Detection: A Reviewcited by 118
  3. 2019Analysis of Explainers of Black Box Deep Neural Networks for Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 93
  4. 20206-Layer Model for a Structured Description and Categorization of Urban Traffic and Environmentcited by 26
  5. 2022What should AI see? Using the Public's Opinion to Determine the Perception of an AIcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.