mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning with centralized training and decentralized execution for transportation infrastructure management

arXiv 2401.12455 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2024cs.MA cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Life-cycle management of large-scale transportation systems requires determining a sequence of inspection and maintenance decisions to minimize long-term risks and costs while dealing with multiple uncertainties and constraints that lie in high-dimensional spaces. Traditional approaches have been widely applied but often suffer from limitations related to optimality, scalability, and the ability to properly handle uncertainty. Moreover, many existing methods rely on unconstrained formulations that overlook critical operational constraints. We address these issues in this work by casting the optimization problem within the framework of constrained Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs), which provide a robust mathematical foundation for stochastic sequential decision-making under observation uncertainties, in the presence of risk and resource limitations. To tackle the high dimensionality of state and action spaces, we propose DDMAC-CTDE, a Deep Decentralized Multi-Agent Actor-Critic (DDMAC) reinforcement learning architecture with Centralized Training and Decentralized Execution (CTDE). To demonstrate the utility of the proposed framework, we also develop a new comprehensive benchmark environment representing an existing transportation network in Virginia, U.S., with heterogeneous pavement and bridge assets undergoing nonstationary degradation. This environment incorporates multiple practical constraints related to budget limits, performance guidelines, traffic delays, and risk considerations. On this benchmark, DDMAC-CTDE consistently outperforms standard transportation management baselines, producing better policies. Together, the proposed framework and benchmark provide (i) a scalable, constraint-aware methodology, and (ii) a realistic, rigorous testbed for comprehensive evaluation of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) for transportation infrastructure management.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 115 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2024.

Builds on

18 of 115 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  3. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  4. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  5. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  6. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  7. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  8. 2013The Complexity of Decentralized Control of Markov Decision Processescited by 225
  9. 2016Sample Efficient Actor-Critic with Experience Replaycited by 185
  10. 2020Value-Decomposition Multi-Agent Actor-Criticscited by 47
  11. 2018Managing engineering systems with large state and action spaces through deep reinforcement learningcited by 32
  12. 2020Deep reinforcement learning driven inspection and maintenance planning under incomplete information and constraintscited by 18
6 more
  1. 2023POMDP inference and robust solution via deep reinforcement learning: An application to railway optimal maintenancecited by 13
  2. 2020Optimal Inspection and Maintenance Planning for Deteriorating Structural Components through Dynamic Bayesian Networks and Markov Decision Processescited by 12
  3. 2022Inference and dynamic decision-making for deteriorating systems with probabilistic dependencies through Bayesian networks and deep reinforcement learningcited by 11
  4. 2022Bridging POMDPs and Bayesian decision making for robust maintenance planning under model uncertainty: An application to railway systemscited by 11
  5. 2023IMP-MARL: a Suite of Environments for Large-scale Infrastructure Management Planning via MARLcited by 9
  6. 2020Hamiltonian MCMC methods for estimating rare events probabilities in high-dimensional problemscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.