Inference and dynamic decision-making for deteriorating systems with probabilistic dependencies through Bayesian networks and deep reinforcement learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the context of modern environmental and societal concerns, there is an increasing demand for methods able to identify management strategies for civil engineering systems, minimizing structural failure risks while optimally planning inspection and maintenance (I&M) processes. Most available methods simplify the I&M decision problem to the component level due to the computational complexity associated with global optimization methodologies under joint system-level state descriptions. In this paper, we propose an efficient algorithmic framework for inference and decision-making under uncertainty for engineering systems exposed to deteriorating environments, providing optimal management strategies directly at the system level. In our approach, the decision problem is formulated as a factored partially observable Markov decision process, whose dynamics are encoded in Bayesian network conditional structures. The methodology can handle environments under equal or general, unequal deterioration correlations among components, through Gaussian hierarchical structures and dynamic Bayesian networks. In terms of policy optimization, we adopt a deep decentralized multi-agent actor-critic (DDMAC) reinforcement learning approach, in which the policies are approximated by actor neural networks guided by a critic network. By including deterioration dependence in the simulated environment, and by formulating the cost model at the system level, DDMAC policies intrinsically consider the underlying system-effects. This is demonstrated through numerical experiments conducted for both a 9-out-of-10 system and a steel frame under fatigue deterioration. Results demonstrate that DDMAC policies offer substantial benefits when compared to state-of-the-art heuristic approaches. The inherent consideration of system-effects by DDMAC strategies is also interpreted based on the learned policies.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2022.
Builds on
7 of 63 references.
References · 7
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overviewcited by 327
- 2018Managing engineering systems with large state and action spaces through deep reinforcement learningcited by 32
- 2020Deep reinforcement learning driven inspection and maintenance planning under incomplete information and constraintscited by 18
- 2020Optimal Inspection and Maintenance Planning for Deteriorating Structural Components through Dynamic Bayesian Networks and Markov Decision Processescited by 12
- 2021Optimal adaptive inspection and maintenance planning for deteriorating structural systemscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2023POMDP inference and robust solution via deep reinforcement learning: An application to railway optimal maintenancecited by 13
- 2022Bridging POMDPs and Bayesian decision making for robust maintenance planning under model uncertainty: An application to railway systemscited by 11
- 2023IMP-MARL: a Suite of Environments for Large-scale Infrastructure Management Planning via MARLcited by 9
- 2024Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning with centralized training and decentralized execution for transportation infrastructure managementcited by 5
- 2023An investigation of belief-free DRL and MCTS for inspection and maintenance planningcited by 1
- 2024Deep Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Utility-Based Infrastructural Maintenance Optimizationcited by 1
- 2025A generative adversarial network optimization method for damage detection and digital twinning by deep AI fault learning: Z24 Bridge structural health monitoring benchmark validationcited by 1
- 2022Farm-wide virtual load monitoring for offshore wind structures via Bayesian neural networkscited by 0
- 2024SHM-Traffic: DRL and Transfer learning based UAV Control for Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges with Trafficcited by 0
- 2026COOL-MC: Verifying and Explaining RL Policies for Multi-bridge Network Maintenancecited by 0
- 2026Graph-Based Inference and Topology-Aware Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Large-Scale Railway Network Managementcited by 0
- 2026Graph-Based Inference and Topology-Aware Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Large-Scale Railway Network Management24 Sep 2026
- 2026COOL-MC: Verifying and Explaining RL Policies for Multi-bridge Network Maintenance8 Mar 2026
- 2025A generative adversarial network optimization method for damage detection and digital twinning by deep AI fault learning: Z24 Bridge structural health monitoring benchmark validation30 Oct 2025
- 2024Deep Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Utility-Based Infrastructural Maintenance Optimization10 Jun 2024
- 2024SHM-Traffic: DRL and Transfer learning based UAV Control for Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges with Traffic22 Feb 2024
- 2024Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning with centralized training and decentralized execution for transportation infrastructure management23 Jan 2024
- 2023An investigation of belief-free DRL and MCTS for inspection and maintenance planning22 Dec 2023
- 2023POMDP inference and robust solution via deep reinforcement learning: An application to railway optimal maintenance16 Jul 2023
- 2023IMP-MARL: a Suite of Environments for Large-scale Infrastructure Management Planning via MARL20 Jun 2023
- 2022Bridging POMDPs and Bayesian decision making for robust maintenance planning under model uncertainty: An application to railway systems15 Dec 2022
- 2022Farm-wide virtual load monitoring for offshore wind structures via Bayesian neural networks31 Oct 2022