mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SymbolNet: Neural Symbolic Regression with Adaptive Dynamic Pruning for Compression

arXiv 2401.09949 ↗First posted 18 Jan 2024cs.LG hep-ex physics.ins-detcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Compact symbolic expressions have been shown to be more efficient than neural network models in terms of resource consumption and inference speed when implemented on custom hardware such as FPGAs, while maintaining comparable accuracy~citetsoi2023symbolic. These capabilities are highly valuable in environments with stringent computational resource constraints, such as high-energy physics experiments at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. However, finding compact expressions for high-dimensional datasets remains challenging due to the inherent limitations of genetic programming, the search algorithm of most symbolic regression methods. Contrary to genetic programming, the neural network approach to symbolic regression offers scalability to high-dimensional inputs and leverages gradient methods for faster equation searching. Common ways of constraining expression complexity often involve multistage pruning with fine-tuning, which can result in significant performance loss. In this work, we propose ttSymbolNet, a neural network approach to symbolic regression specifically designed as a model compression technique, aimed at enabling low-latency inference for high-dimensional inputs on custom hardware such as FPGAs. This framework allows dynamic pruning of model weights, input features, and mathematical operators in a single training process, where both training loss and expression complexity are optimized simultaneously. We introduce a sparsity regularization term for each pruning type, which can adaptively adjust its strength, leading to convergence at a target sparsity ratio. Unlike most existing symbolic regression methods that struggle with datasets containing more than O(10) inputs, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our model on the LHC jet tagging task (16 inputs), MNIST (784 inputs), and SVHN (3072 inputs).

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2024.

Builds on

32 of 66 references.

References · 32

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
  3. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 596
  4. 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 571
  5. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  6. 2015Deep Learning with Limited Numerical Precisioncited by 368
  7. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  8. 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 209
  9. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 195
  10. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 185
  11. 2018Learning Equations for Extrapolation and Controlcited by 151
  12. 2018Fast inference of deep neural networks in FPGAs for particle physicscited by 132
20 more
  1. 2016Extrapolation and learning equationscited by 106
  2. 2021SymbolicGPT: A Generative Transformer Model for Symbolic Regressioncited by 101
  3. 2019Integration of Neural Network-Based Symbolic Regression in Deep Learning for Scientific Discoverycited by 93
  4. 2021PySINDy: A comprehensive Python package for robust sparse system identificationcited by 88
  5. 2020Automatic heterogeneous quantization of deep neural networks for low-latency inference on the edge for particle detectorscited by 78
  6. 2022Rediscovering orbital mechanics with machine learningcited by 71
  7. 2022Symbolic Regression is NP-hardcited by 68
  8. 2020Dynamic Sparse Training: Find Efficient Sparse Network From Scratch With Trainable Masked Layerscited by 66
  9. 2022SymFormer: End-to-end symbolic regression using transformer-based architecturecited by 56
  10. 2021Fast convolutional neural networks on FPGAs with hls4mlcited by 42
  11. 2022A computational framework for physics-informed symbolic regression with straightforward integration of domain knowledgecited by 31
  12. 2021Symbolic regression for scientific discovery: an application to wind speed forecastingcited by 16
  13. 2023Toward Physically Plausible Data-Driven Models: A Novel Neural Network Approach to Symbolic Regressioncited by 14
  14. 2021Informed Equation Learningcited by 10
  15. 2023Symbolic Regression on FPGAs for Fast Machine Learning Inferencecited by 9
  16. 2022Augmenting astrophysical scaling relations with machine learning: application to reducing the Sunyaev-Zeldovich flux-mass scattercited by 6
  17. 2022The SZ flux-mass (Y-M) relation at low halo masses: improvements with symbolic regression and strong constraints on baryonic feedbackcited by 5
  18. 2022Bayesian Learning to Discover Mathematical Operations in Governing Equations of Dynamic Systemscited by 3
  19. 2022Symbolic Regression with Fast Function Extraction and Nonlinear Least Squares Optimizationcited by 2
  20. 2023Differentiable Genetic Programming for High-dimensional Symbolic Regressioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.