mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Informed Equation Learning

arXiv 2105.06331 ↗First posted 13 May 2021cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Distilling data into compact and interpretable analytic equations is one of the goals of science. Instead, contemporary supervised machine learning methods mostly produce unstructured and dense maps from input to output. Particularly in deep learning, this property is owed to the generic nature of simple standard link functions. To learn equations rather than maps, standard non-linearities can be replaced with structured building blocks of atomic functions. However, without strong priors on sparsity and structure, representational complexity and numerical conditioning limit this direct approach. To scale to realistic settings in science and engineering, we propose an informed equation learning system. It provides a way to incorporate expert knowledge about what are permitted or prohibited equation components, as well as a domain-dependent structured sparsity prior. Our system then utilizes a robust method to learn equations with atomic functions exhibiting singularities, as e.g. logarithm and division. We demonstrate several artificial and real-world experiments from the engineering domain, in which our system learns interpretable models of high predictive power.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2021.

Builds on

16 of 38 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  3. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  4. 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,135
  5. 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 571
  6. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  7. 2017Grammar Variational Autoencodercited by 283
  8. 2019Deep Learning for Symbolic Mathematicscited by 266
  9. 2018PDE-Net 2.0: Learning PDEs from Data with A Numeric-Symbolic Hybrid Deep Networkcited by 208
  10. 2018Learning Equations for Extrapolation and Controlcited by 151
  11. 2016Extrapolation and learning equationscited by 106
  12. 2019Integration of Neural Network-Based Symbolic Regression in Deep Learning for Scientific Discoverycited by 93
4 more
  1. 2019Bayesian Symbolic Regressioncited by 77
  2. 2014Learning to Discover Efficient Mathematical Identitiescited by 9
  3. 2019Analytical classical density functionals from an equation learning networkcited by 7
  4. 2019Neural-Guided Symbolic Regression with Asymptotic Constraintscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

10 papers.