mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Error-Based Optimization: Experience-Driven Symbolic Regression with Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2601.14693 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Symbolic Regression aims to automatically identify compact and interpretable mathematical expressions that model the functional relationship between input and output variables. Most existing search-based symbolic regression methods typically rely on the fitting error to inform the search process. However, in the vast expression space, numerous candidate expressions may exhibit similar error values while differing substantially in structure, leading to ambiguous search directions and hindering convergence to the underlying true function. To address this challenge, we propose a novel framework named EGRL-SR (Experience-driven Goal-conditioned Reinforcement Learning for Symbolic Regression). In contrast to traditional error-driven approaches, EGRL-SR introduces a new perspective: leveraging precise historical trajectories and optimizing the action-value network to proactively guide the search process, thereby achieving a more robust expression search. Specifically, we formulate symbolic regression as a goal-conditioned reinforcement learning problem and incorporate hindsight experience replay, allowing the action-value network to generalize common mapping patterns from diverse input-output pairs. Moreover, we design an all-point satisfaction binary reward function that encourages the action-value network to focus on structural patterns rather than low-error expressions, and concurrently propose a structure-guided heuristic exploration strategy to enhance search diversity and space coverage. Experiments on public benchmarks show that EGRL-SR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in recovery rate and robustness, and can recover more complex expressions under the same search budget. Ablation results validate that the action-value network effectively guides the search, with both the reward function and the exploration strategy playing critical roles.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2026.

Builds on

13 of 29 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  3. 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 769
  4. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  5. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 195
  6. 2018Learning Equations for Extrapolation and Controlcited by 151
  7. 2016Extrapolation and learning equationscited by 106
  8. 2021SymbolicGPT: A Generative Transformer Model for Symbolic Regressioncited by 101
  9. 2021Symbolic Regression via Neural-Guided Genetic Programming Population Seedingcited by 97
  10. 2023Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regressioncited by 72
  11. 2023A Neural-Guided Dynamic Symbolic Network for Exploring Mathematical Expressions from Datacited by 14
  12. 2024SymbolNet: Neural Symbolic Regression with Adaptive Dynamic Pruning for Compressioncited by 6
1 more
  1. 2024PruneSymNet: A Symbolic Neural Network and Pruning Algorithm for Symbolic Regressioncited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.