Augmenting astrophysical scaling relations with machine learning: application to reducing the Sunyaev-Zeldovich flux-mass scatter
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Complex astrophysical systems often exhibit low-scatter relations between observable properties (e.g., luminosity, velocity dispersion, oscillation period). These scaling relations illuminate the underlying physics, and can provide observational tools for estimating masses and distances. Machine learning can provide a fast and systematic way to search for new scaling relations (or for simple extensions to existing relations) in abstract high-dimensional parameter spaces. We use a machine learning tool called symbolic regression (SR), which models patterns in a dataset in the form of analytic equations. We focus on the Sunyaev-Zeldovich flux-cluster mass relation (YSZ-M), the scatter in which affects inference of cosmological parameters from cluster abundance data. Using SR on the data from the IllustrisTNG hydrodynamical simulation, we find a new proxy for cluster mass which combines YSZ and concentration of ionized gas (cgas): M propto Yconc3/5 equiv YSZ3/5 (1-A, cgas). Yconc reduces the scatter in the predicted M by ~ 20-30% for large clusters (Mgtrsim 1014, h-1 , M_odot), as compared to using just YSZ. We show that the dependence on cgas is linked to cores of clusters exhibiting larger scatter than their outskirts. Finally, we test Yconc on clusters from CAMELS simulations and show that Yconc is robust against variations in cosmology, subgrid physics, and cosmic variance. Our results and methodology can be useful for accurate multiwavelength cluster mass estimation from upcoming CMB and X-ray surveys like ACT, SO, eROSITA and CMB-S4.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 191 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2022.
Builds on
28 of 191 references.
References · 28
- 2017Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamicscited by 494
- 2020Universal Differential Equations for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 353
- 2020Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biasescited by 344
- 2017Grammar Variational Autoencodercited by 285
- 2018Learning Equations for Extrapolation and Controlcited by 156
- 2021Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modellingcited by 88
- 2020AI Poincar'e: Machine Learning Conservation Laws from Trajectoriescited by 77
- 2019DeepMoD: Deep learning for Model Discovery in noisy datacited by 71
- 2020A Bayesian machine scientist to aid in the solution of challenging scientific problemscited by 61
- 2019Learning Symbolic Physics with Graph Networkscited by 53
- 2020From Fourier to Koopman: Spectral Methods for Long-term Time Series Predictioncited by 50
- 2018Learning to Predict the Cosmological Structure Formationcited by 38
16 more
- 2021The CAMELS Multifield Dataset: Learning the Universe's Fundamental Parameters with Artificial Intelligencecited by 18
- 2020AI-assisted super-resolution cosmological simulationscited by 15
- 2021Inferring halo masses with Graph Neural Networkscited by 13
- 2020Disentangling a Deep Learned Volume Formulacited by 12
- 2021Symbolic regression outperforms other models for small data setscited by 12
- 2021Multifield Cosmology with Artificial Intelligencecited by 12
- 2018A volumetric deep Convolutional Neural Network for simulation of mock dark matter halo cataloguescited by 7
- 2019Painting with baryons: augmenting N-body simulations with gas using deep generative modelscited by 7
- 2020Mass Estimation of Galaxy Clusters with Deep Learning I: Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effectcited by 6
- 2021Robust marginalization of baryonic effects for cosmological inference at the field levelcited by 6
- 2021AI-assisted super-resolution cosmological simulations II: Halo substructures, velocities and higher order statisticscited by 5
- 2019From Dark Matter to Galaxies with Convolutional Networkscited by 3
- 2019Learning neutrino effects in Cosmology with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2019From Dark Matter to Galaxies with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2019HIGAN: Cosmic Neutral Hydrogen with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2
- 2020A machine learning approach to galaxy properties: joint redshift-stellar mass probability distributions with Random Forestcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022SymFormer: End-to-end symbolic regression using transformer-based architecturecited by 59
- 2023Deep symbolic regression for physics guided by units constraints: toward the automated discovery of physical lawscited by 55
- 2024SymbolNet: Neural Symbolic Regression with Adaptive Dynamic Pruning for Compressioncited by 7
- 2022The SZ flux-mass (Y-M) relation at low halo masses: improvements with symbolic regression and strong constraints on baryonic feedbackcited by 5
- 2024Interactive Symbolic Regression through Offline Reinforcement Learning: A Co-Design Frameworkcited by 1
- 2026Data-driven Progressive Discovery of Physical Lawscited by 0
- 2026Data-driven Progressive Discovery of Physical Laws14 Mar 2026
- 2024Interactive Symbolic Regression through Offline Reinforcement Learning: A Co-Design Framework7 Feb 2024
- 2024SymbolNet: Neural Symbolic Regression with Adaptive Dynamic Pruning for Compression18 Jan 2024
- 2023Deep symbolic regression for physics guided by units constraints: toward the automated discovery of physical laws6 Mar 2023
- 2022The SZ flux-mass (Y-M) relation at low halo masses: improvements with symbolic regression and strong constraints on baryonic feedback5 Sep 2022
- 2022SymFormer: End-to-end symbolic regression using transformer-based architecture31 May 2022