mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reinforcement Learning from LLM Feedback to Counteract Goal Misgeneralization

arXiv 2401.07181 ↗First posted 14 Jan 2024cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a method to address goal misgeneralization in reinforcement learning (RL), leveraging Large Language Model (LLM) feedback during training. Goal misgeneralization, a type of robustness failure in RL occurs when an agent retains its capabilities out-of-distribution yet pursues a proxy rather than the intended one. Our approach utilizes LLMs to analyze an RL agent's policies during training and identify potential failure scenarios. The RL agent is then deployed in these scenarios, and a reward model is learnt through the LLM preferences and feedback. This LLM-informed reward model is used to further train the RL agent on the original dataset. We apply our method to a maze navigation task, and show marked improvements in goal generalization, especially in cases where true and proxy goals are somewhat distinguishable and behavioral biases are pronounced. This study demonstrates how the LLM, despite its lack of task proficiency, can efficiently supervise RL agents, providing scalable oversight and valuable insights for enhancing goal-directed learning in RL through the use of LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2024.

Builds on

17 of 30 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  3. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  4. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  5. 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
  6. 2019Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learningcited by 478
  7. 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
  8. 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research directioncited by 438
  9. 2018AI safety via debatecited by 384
  10. 2018Reward learning from human preferences and demonstrations in Ataricited by 314
  11. 2022The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Modelscited by 312
  12. 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 249
5 more
  1. 2018Constructing Unrestricted Adversarial Examples with Generative Modelscited by 135
  2. 2023Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systemscited by 134
  3. 2017Reinforcement Learning with a Corrupted Reward Channelcited by 68
  4. 2021Ethical-Advice Taker: Do Language Models Understand Natural Language Interventions?cited by 46
  5. 2020An overview of 11 proposals for building safe advanced AIcited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Rethinking Agentic Reinforcement Learning In Large Language Models
  2. 2025Guiding Exploration in Reinforcement Learning Through LLM-Augmented Observations
  3. 2025Response-Level Rewards Are All You Need for Online Reinforcement Learning in LLMs: A Mathematical Perspective
  4. 2023LgTS: Dynamic Task Sampling using LLM-generated sub-goals for Reinforcement Learning Agents
  5. 2025A Technical Survey of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Large Language Models
  6. 2025LLM-Driven Policy Diffusion: Enhancing Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning-Based LLM Reasoning: Design, Challenges, and Evaluation
  8. 2025From Trial-and-Error to Improvement: A Systematic Analysis of LLM Exploration Mechanisms in RLVR