mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LgTS: Dynamic Task Sampling using LLM-generated sub-goals for Reinforcement Learning Agents

arXiv 2310.09454 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2023cs.AI cs.LGcited by 11

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLM) has promoted their usage in problems that require high-level planning for robots and artificial agents. However, current techniques that utilize LLMs for such planning tasks make certain key assumptions such as, access to datasets that permit finetuning, meticulously engineered prompts that only provide relevant and essential information to the LLM, and most importantly, a deterministic approach to allow execution of the LLM responses either in the form of existing policies or plan operators. In this work, we propose LgTS (LLM-guided Teacher-Student learning), a novel approach that explores the planning abilities of LLMs to provide a graphical representation of the sub-goals to a reinforcement learning (RL) agent that does not have access to the transition dynamics of the environment. The RL agent uses Teacher-Student learning algorithm to learn a set of successful policies for reaching the goal state from the start state while simultaneously minimizing the number of environmental interactions. Unlike previous methods that utilize LLMs, our approach does not assume access to a propreitary or a fine-tuned LLM, nor does it require pre-trained policies that achieve the sub-goals proposed by the LLM. Through experiments on a gridworld based DoorKey domain and a search-and-rescue inspired domain, we show that generating a graphical structure of sub-goals helps in learning policies for the LLM proposed sub-goals and the Teacher-Student learning algorithm minimizes the number of environment interactions when the transition dynamics are unknown.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2023.

Builds on

26 of 40 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  4. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
  5. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  6. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  7. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,037
  8. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 676
  9. 2022ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language Modelscited by 598
  10. 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 496
  11. 2022LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Modelscited by 459
  12. 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 457
14 more
  1. 2020Curriculum Learning for Reinforcement Learning Domains: A Framework and Surveycited by 350
  2. 2023Reward Design with Language Modelscited by 257
  3. 2017Teacher-Student Curriculum Learningcited by 197
  4. 2020Reward Machines: Exploiting Reward Function Structure in Reinforcement Learningcited by 183
  5. 2023Open-World Object Manipulation using Pre-trained Vision-Language Modelscited by 155
  6. 2023Task and Motion Planning with Large Language Models for Object Rearrangementcited by 140
  7. 2023LLM-Grounder: Open-Vocabulary 3D Visual Grounding with Large Language Model as an Agentcited by 134
  8. 2016Reinforcement Learning With Temporal Logic Rewardscited by 114
  9. 2019Control Synthesis from Linear Temporal Logic Specifications using Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 74
  10. 2018Foundations for Restraining Bolts: Reinforcement Learning with LTLf/LDLf restraining specificationscited by 69
  11. 2019Transfer of Temporal Logic Formulas in Reinforcement Learningcited by 31
  12. 2021Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 27
  13. 2022Overcoming Exploration: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control in Cluttered Environments from Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 11
  14. 2022ACuTE: Automatic Curriculum Transfer from Simple to Complex Environmentscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Learning When to Plan: Efficiently Allocating Test-Time Compute for LLM Agents
  2. 2023Large Language Model as a Policy Teacher for Training Reinforcement Learning Agents
  3. 2026Hybrid LLM-Augmented Reinforcement Learning Agents for Complex Sequential Decision Tasks
  4. 2025LLM-Guided Task- and Affordance-Level Exploration in Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2025Guiding Exploration in Reinforcement Learning Through LLM-Augmented Observations
  6. 2025LLM-Explorer: A Plug-in Reinforcement Learning Policy Exploration Enhancement Driven by Large Language Models
  7. 2023LLM Augmented Hierarchical Agents
  8. 2024Mutual Enhancement of Large Language and Reinforcement Learning Models through Bi-Directional Feedback Mechanisms: A Planning Case Study