mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unveiling and Mitigating Bias in Large Language Model Recommendations: A Path to Fairness

arXiv 2409.10825 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2024cs.IR cs.AI cs.ETcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Model (LLM)-based recommendation systems excel in delivering comprehensive suggestions by deeply analyzing content and user behavior. However, they often inherit biases from skewed training data, favoring mainstream content while underrepresenting diverse or non-traditional options. This study explores the interplay between bias and LLM-based recommendation systems, focusing on music, song, and book recommendations across diverse demographic and cultural groups. This paper analyzes bias in LLM-based recommendation systems across multiple models (GPT, LLaMA, and Gemini), revealing its deep and pervasive impact on outcomes. Intersecting identities and contextual factors, like socioeconomic status, further amplify biases, complicating fair recommendations across diverse groups. Our findings reveal that bias in these systems is deeply ingrained, yet even simple interventions like prompt engineering can significantly reduce it. We further propose a retrieval-augmented generation strategy to mitigate bias more effectively. Numerical experiments validate these strategies, demonstrating both the pervasive nature of bias and the impact of the proposed solutions.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2024.

Builds on

55 of 84 references.

References · 55

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
  6. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
  7. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
  8. 2024The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructionscited by 493
  9. 2023From Pretraining Data to Language Models to Downstream Tasks: Tracking the Trails of Political Biases Leading to Unfair NLP Modelscited by 260
  10. 2023Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Biascited by 232
  11. 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214
  12. 2023Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Studycited by 206
38 more
  1. 2024Judging the Judges: Evaluating Alignment and Vulnerabilities in LLMs-as-Judgescited by 205
  2. 2021Societal Biases in Language Generation: Progress and Challengescited by 202
  3. 2023"Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letterscited by 199
  4. 2023Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraintscited by 174
  5. 2023Having Beer after Prayer? Measuring Cultural Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 153
  6. 2019Queens are Powerful too: Mitigating Gender Bias in Dialogue Generationcited by 152
  7. 2022Probing Pre-Trained Language Models for Cross-Cultural Differences in Valuescited by 149
  8. 2023Cultural Bias and Cultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 149
  9. 2017How Algorithmic Confounding in Recommendation Systems Increases Homogeneity and Decreases Utilitycited by 120
  10. 2023Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendationcited by 114
  11. 2023Cultural Alignment in Large Language Models: An Explanatory Analysis Based on Hofstede's Cultural Dimensionscited by 112
  12. 2022The Ghost in the Machine has an American accent: value conflict in GPT-3cited by 105
  13. 2024An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge for LLM Evaluation: Fine-tuned Judge Model is not a General Substitute for GPT-4cited by 94
  14. 2020Feedback Loop and Bias Amplification in Recommender Systemscited by 90
  15. 2023Moral Foundations of Large Language Modelscited by 85
  16. 2014Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discriminationcited by 83
  17. 2019Managing Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems with Personalized Re-rankingcited by 82
  18. 2021On Measures of Biases and Harms in NLPcited by 81
  19. 2022Extracting Cultural Commonsense Knowledge at Scalecited by 76
  20. 2022On the Intrinsic and Extrinsic Fairness Evaluation Metrics for Contextualized Language Representationscited by 75
  21. 2019Degenerate Feedback Loops in Recommender Systemscited by 67
  22. 2022Towards Intersectionality in Machine Learning: Including More Identities, Handling Underrepresentation, and Performing Evaluationcited by 59
  23. 2023AudioChatLlama: Towards General-Purpose Speech Abilities for LLMscited by 59
  24. 2023Large Language Model Enhanced Multi-Agent Systems for 6G Communicationscited by 53
  25. 2023Knowledge of cultural moral norms in large language modelscited by 51
  26. 2024VisEval: A Benchmark for Data Visualization in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 45
  27. 2023Not All Countries Celebrate Thanksgiving: On the Cultural Dominance in Large Language Modelscited by 43
  28. 2022Mitigating Gender Bias in Distilled Language Models via Counterfactual Role Reversalcited by 40
  29. 2024Angry Men, Sad Women: Large Language Models Reflect Gendered Stereotypes in Emotion Attributioncited by 40
  30. 2021User-centered Evaluation of Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemscited by 38
  31. 2022Measuring Representational Harms in Image Captioningcited by 36
  32. 2022Speaking Multiple Languages Affects the Moral Bias of Language Modelscited by 34
  33. 2024Interactive AI with Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Next Generation Networkingcited by 34
  34. 2021Men Are Elected, Women Are Married: Events Gender Bias on Wikipediacited by 30
  35. 2022A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Bias Mitigation Methods for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 30
  36. 2024Understanding Biases in ChatGPT-based Recommender Systems: Provider Fairness, Temporal Stability, and Recencycited by 28
  37. 2023Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairnesscited by 26
  38. 2023Align on the Fly: Adapting Chatbot Behavior to Established Normscited by 23

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Investigating and Mitigating Stereotype-aware Unfairness in LLM-based Recommendations
  2. 2025Neutralizing Popularity Bias in LLM-based Recommendation via Counterfactual Reasoning Guidelines
  3. 2026Uncertainty and Fairness Awareness in LLM-Based Recommendation Systems
  4. 2025Generative Large Recommendation Models: Emerging Trends in LLMs for Recommendation
  5. 2024Exploring the Impact of Large Language Models on Recommender Systems: An Extensive Review
  6. 2025Does LLM Focus on the Right Words? Mitigating Context Bias in LLM-based Recommenders
  7. 2025A Comprehensive Review on Harnessing Large Language Models to Overcome Recommender System Challenges
  8. 2026Evaluating Social Bias in RAG Systems: When External Context Helps and Reasoning Hurts