Exposing Product Bias in LLM Investment Recommendation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs), as a new generation of recommendation engines, possess powerful summarization and data analysis capabilities, surpassing traditional recommendation systems in both scope and performance. One promising application is investment recommendation. In this paper, we reveal a novel product bias in LLM investment recommendation, where LLMs exhibit systematic preferences for specific products. Such preferences can subtly influence user investment decisions, potentially leading to inflated valuations of products and financial bubbles, posing risks to both individual investors and market stability. To comprehensively study the product bias, we develop an automated pipeline to create a dataset of 567,000 samples across five asset classes (stocks, mutual funds, cryptocurrencies, savings, and portfolios). With this dataset, we present the bf first study on product bias in LLM investment recommendations. Our findings reveal that LLMs exhibit clear product preferences, such as certain stocks (e.g., `AAPL' from Apple and `MSFT' from Microsoft). Notably, this bias persists even after applying debiasing techniques. We urge AI researchers to take heed of the product bias in LLM investment recommendations and its implications, ensuring fairness and security in the digital space and market.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2025.
Builds on
27 of 73 references.
References · 27
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 701
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
- 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 377
- 2022Prompting GPT-3 To Be Reliablecited by 260
- 2023PIXIU: A Large Language Model, Instruction Data and Evaluation Benchmark for Financecited by 222
- 2023FinMem: A Performance-Enhanced LLM Trading Agent with Layered Memory and Character Designcited by 164
- 2023InvestLM: A Large Language Model for Investment using Financial Domain Instruction Tuningcited by 82
- 2023DISC-FinLLM: A Chinese Financial Large Language Model based on Multiple Experts Fine-tuningcited by 64
- 2024INVESTORBENCH: A Benchmark for Financial Decision-Making Tasks with LLM-based Agentcited by 64
- 2021Collecting a Large-Scale Gender Bias Dataset for Coreference Resolution and Machine Translationcited by 62
- 2023BiasAsker: Measuring the Bias in Conversational AI Systemcited by 53
15 more
- 2024AlphaFin: Benchmarking Financial Analysis with Retrieval-Augmented Stock-Chain Frameworkcited by 47
- 2023ChatGPT Informed Graph Neural Network for Stock Movement Predictioncited by 41
- 2024Prompting Techniques for Reducing Social Bias in LLMs through System 1 and System 2 Cognitive Processescited by 39
- 2021Improving Gender Fairness of Pre-Trained Language Models without Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 35
- 2024QuantAgent: Seeking Holy Grail in Trading by Self-Improving Large Language Modelcited by 30
- 2024Can Large Language Models Beat Wall Street? Unveiling the Potential of AI in Stock Selectioncited by 29
- 2024Understanding Biases in ChatGPT-based Recommender Systems: Provider Fairness, Temporal Stability, and Recencycited by 28
- 2018Beyond Greedy Ranking: Slate Optimization via List-CVAEcited by 21
- 2024CFaiRLLM: Consumer Fairness Evaluation in Large-Language Model Recommender Systemcited by 18
- 2020FairMatch: A Graph-based Approach for Improving Aggregate Diversity in Recommender Systemscited by 15
- 2024A survey on fairness of large language models in e-commerce: progress, application, and challengecited by 10
- 2024Extracting Structured Insights from Financial News: An Augmented LLM Driven Approachcited by 8
- 2023CGCE: A Chinese Generative Chat Evaluation Benchmark for General and Financial Domainscited by 7
- 2023GPT has become financially literate: Insights from financial literacy tests of GPT and a preliminary test of how people use it as a source of advicecited by 7
- 2024Unveiling Bias in Fairness Evaluations of Large Language Models: A Critical Literature Review of Music and Movie Recommendation Systemscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025Your AI, Not Your View: The Bias of LLMs in Investment Analysiscited by 17
- 2025Uncovering Representation Bias for Investment Decisions in Open-Source Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025Evaluating AI for Finance: Is AI Credible at Assessing Investment Risk?cited by 1
- 2025Synthesizing Behaviorally-Grounded Reasoning Chains: A Data-Generation Framework for Personal Finance LLMscited by 1
- 2026When Do We Need LLMs? A Diagnostic for Language-Driven Banditscited by 0
- 2026Your AI, On a Dial: Controlling Investment Bias in LLMs with a Single Neuroncited by 0
- 2026Your AI, On a Dial: Controlling Investment Bias in LLMs with a Single Neuron24 Aug 2026
- 2026When Do We Need LLMs? A Diagnostic for Language-Driven Bandits7 Apr 2026
- 2025Uncovering Representation Bias for Investment Decisions in Open-Source Large Language Models7 Oct 2025
- 2025Synthesizing Behaviorally-Grounded Reasoning Chains: A Data-Generation Framework for Personal Finance LLMs17 Sep 2025
- 2025Your AI, Not Your View: The Bias of LLMs in Investment Analysis28 Jul 2025
- 2025Evaluating AI for Finance: Is AI Credible at Assessing Investment Risk?25 May 2025