Saliency-Aware Regularized Graph Neural Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The crux of graph classification lies in the effective representation learning for the entire graph. Typical graph neural networks focus on modeling the local dependencies when aggregating features of neighboring nodes, and obtain the representation for the entire graph by aggregating node features. Such methods have two potential limitations: 1) the global node saliency w.r.t. graph classification is not explicitly modeled, which is crucial since different nodes may have different semantic relevance to graph classification; 2) the graph representation directly aggregated from node features may have limited effectiveness to reflect graph-level information. In this work, we propose the Saliency-Aware Regularized Graph Neural Network (SAR-GNN) for graph classification, which consists of two core modules: 1) a traditional graph neural network serving as the backbone for learning node features and 2) the Graph Neural Memory designed to distill a compact graph representation from node features of the backbone. We first estimate the global node saliency by measuring the semantic similarity between the compact graph representation and node features. Then the learned saliency distribution is leveraged to regularize the neighborhood aggregation of the backbone, which facilitates the message passing of features for salient nodes and suppresses the less relevant nodes. Thus, our model can learn more effective graph representation. We demonstrate the merits of SAR-GNN by extensive experiments on seven datasets across various types of graph data. Code will be released.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jan 2024.
Builds on
25 of 43 references.
References · 25
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
- 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
- 2013Spectral Networks and Locally Connected Networks on Graphscited by 1,097
- 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,096
- 2021Perceiver: General Perception with Iterative Attentioncited by 1,089
- 2018Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Poolingcited by 786
13 more
- 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 735
- 2019Graph U-Netscited by 489
- 2019Self-Attention Graph Poolingcited by 421
- 2016Learning Convolutional Neural Networks for Graphscited by 314
- 2020Improving Graph Neural Network Expressivity via Subgraph Isomorphism Countingcited by 312
- 2017Dynamic Edge-Conditioned Filters in Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphscited by 307
- 2019A Fair Comparison of Graph Neural Networks for Graph Classificationcited by 244
- 2019Understanding Attention and Generalization in Graph Neural Networkscited by 169
- 2021Equivariant Subgraph Aggregation Networkscited by 154
- 2019Graph Convolutional Networks with EigenPoolingcited by 94
- 2019Universal Graph Transformer Self-Attention Networkscited by 41
- 2019Are Powerful Graph Neural Nets Necessary? A Dissection on Graph Classificationcited by 39
- 2020Deep Graph Mapper: Seeing Graphs through the Neural Lenscited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.