mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adversarial Attacks on Image Classification Models: Analysis and Defense

arXiv 2312.16880 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2023cs.CV cs.CR cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The notion of adversarial attacks on image classification models based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) is introduced in this work. To classify images, deep learning models called CNNs are frequently used. However, when the networks are subject to adversarial attacks, extremely potent and previously trained CNN models that perform quite effectively on image datasets for image classification tasks may perform poorly. In this work, one well-known adversarial attack known as the fast gradient sign method (FGSM) is explored and its adverse effects on the performances of image classification models are examined. The FGSM attack is simulated on three pre-trained image classifier CNN architectures, ResNet-101, AlexNet, and RegNetY 400MF using randomly chosen images from the ImageNet dataset. The classification accuracies of the models are computed in the absence and presence of the attack to demonstrate the detrimental effect of the attack on the performances of the classifiers. Finally, a mechanism is proposed to defend against the FGSM attack based on a modified defensive distillation-based approach. Extensive results are presented for the validation of the proposed scheme.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2023.

Builds on

23 of 43 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  7. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  8. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  9. 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 954
  10. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  11. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  12. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
11 more
  1. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  2. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
  3. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  4. 2013Do Deep Nets Really Need to be Deep?cited by 466
  5. 2018Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Textcited by 268
  6. 2014Towards Deep Neural Network Architectures Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 146
  7. 2016Defensive Distillation is Not Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 60
  8. 2014Visual Causal Feature Learningcited by 59
  9. 2018On the Robustness of the CVPR 2018 White-Box Adversarial Example Defensescited by 40
  10. 2023Adversarial Attacks on Image Classification Models: FGSM and Patch Attacks and their Impactcited by 6
  11. 2017Feature Squeezing Mitigates and Detects Carlini/Wagner Adversarial Examplescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.