Robust Image Classification: Defensive Strategies against FGSM and PGD Adversarial Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial attacks, particularly the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) pose significant threats to the robustness of deep learning models in image classification. This paper explores and refines defense mechanisms against these attacks to enhance the resilience of neural networks. We employ a combination of adversarial training and innovative preprocessing techniques, aiming to mitigate the impact of adversarial perturbations. Our methodology involves modifying input data before classification and investigating different model architectures and training strategies. Through rigorous evaluation of benchmark datasets, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in defending against FGSM and PGD attacks. Our results show substantial improvements in model robustness compared to baseline methods, highlighting the potential of our defense strategies in real-world applications. This study contributes to the ongoing efforts to develop secure and reliable machine learning systems, offering practical insights and paving the way for future research in adversarial defense. By bridging theoretical advancements and practical implementation, we aim to enhance the trustworthiness of AI applications in safety-critical domains.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2024.
Builds on
18 of 29 references.
References · 18
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
- 2023On the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Image Adversarial Attackscited by 89
6 more
- 2020Adversarial Attack Vulnerability of Medical Image Analysis Systems: Unexplored Factorscited by 39
- 2019Towards Robust Image Classification Using Sequential Attention Modelscited by 27
- 2023Adversarial Attacks on Image Classification Models: FGSM and Patch Attacks and their Impactcited by 6
- 2024AICAttack: Adversarial Image Captioning Attack with Attention-Based Optimizationcited by 5
- 2020TensorShield: Tensor-based Defense Against Adversarial Attacks on Imagescited by 3
- 2023Adversarial Attacks on Image Classification Models: Analysis and Defensecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.