FACTOR: Counterfactual Training-Free Test-Time Adaptation for Open-Vocabulary Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Open-vocabulary object detection often fails under distribution shifts, as it can be misled by spurious correlations between non-causal visual attributes (e.g., brightness, texture) and object categories. Existing test-time adaptation (TTA) methods either depend on costly online optimization or perform global calibration, overlooking the attribute-specific nature of these failures. To address this, we propose FACTOR (counterFACtual training-free Test-time adaptation for Open-vocabulaRy object detection), a lightweight framework grounded in counterfactual reasoning. By perturbing test images along non-causal attributes and comparing region-level predictions between original and counterfactual views, FACTOR quantifies attribute sensitivity, semantic relevance, and prediction variation to selectively suppress attribute-dependent predictions-without parameter updates. Experiments on PASCAL-C, COCO-C, and FoggyCityscapes show that FACTOR consistently outperforms prior TTA methods, demonstrating that explicit counterfactual reasoning effectively improves robustness under distribution shifts.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2026.
Builds on
50 of 59 references.
References · 50
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
- 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,427
- 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,306
38 more
- 2021Grounded Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 1,147
- 2021Open-vocabulary Object Detection via Vision and Language Knowledge Distillationcited by 903
- 2018Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Searchcited by 902
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 762
- 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 626
- 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 572
- 2024YOLO-World: Real-Time Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 498
- 2020Open-Vocabulary Object Detection Using Captionscited by 427
- 2017Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Datacited by 401
- 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 379
- 2016The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorialcited by 364
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
- 2017Population Based Training of Neural Networkscited by 351
- 2017Large-Scale Evolution of Image Classifierscited by 348
- 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
- 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 312
- 2022Simple Open-Vocabulary Object Detection with Vision Transformerscited by 303
- 2020Counterfactual VQA: A Cause-Effect Look at Language Biascited by 266
- 2022DetCLIP: Dictionary-Enriched Visual-Concept Paralleled Pre-training for Open-world Detectioncited by 176
- 2023Diverse Data Augmentation with Diffusions for Effective Test-time Prompt Tuningcited by 150
- 2024Efficient Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Modelscited by 138
- 2021Counterfactual Generative Networkscited by 111
- 2022Revisiting Realistic Test-Time Training: Sequential Inference and Adaptation by Anchored Clusteringcited by 44
- 2022Towards Online Domain Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 36
- 2024Dual Prototype Evolving for Test-Time Generalization of Vision-Language Modelscited by 36
- 2025R-TPT: Improving Adversarial Robustness of Vision-Language Models through Test-Time Prompt Tuningcited by 33
- 2021Contrastive Vision-Language Pre-training with Limited Resourcescited by 25
- 2024Historical Test-time Prompt Tuning for Vision Foundation Modelscited by 21
- 2025Bayesian Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Modelscited by 21
- 2023What, How, and When Should Object Detectors Update in Continually Changing Test Domains?cited by 15
- 2025O-TPT: Orthogonality Constraints for Calibrating Test-time Prompt Tuning in Vision-Language Modelscited by 14
- 2023STFAR: Improving Object Detection Robustness at Test-Time by Self-Training with Feature Alignment Regularizationcited by 12
- 2025Efficient Test-time Adaptive Object Detection via Sensitivity-Guided Pruningcited by 6
- 2025Test-Time Adaptive Object Detection with Foundation Modelcited by 4
- 2025Explaining Domain Shifts in Language: Concept erasing for Interpretable Image Classificationcited by 2
- 2025Bayesian Test-time Adaptation for Object Recognition and Detection with Vision-language Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.