CD-Buffer: Complementary Dual-Buffer Framework for Test-Time Adaptation in Adverse Weather Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) enables real-time adaptation to domain shifts without off-line retraining. Recent TTA methods have predominantly explored additive approaches that introduce lightweight modules for feature refinement. Recently, a subtractive approach that removes domain-sensitive channels has emerged as an alternative direction. We observe that these paradigms exhibit complementary effectiveness patterns: subtractive methods excel under severe shifts by removing corrupted features, while additive methods are effective under moderate shifts requiring refinement. However, each paradigm operates effectively only within limited shift severity ranges, failing to generalize across diverse corruption levels. This leads to the following question: can we adaptively balance both strategies based on measured feature-level domain shift? We propose CD-Buffer, a novel complementary dual-buffer framework where subtractive and additive mechanisms operate in opposite yet coordinated directions driven by a unified discrepancy metric. Our key innovation lies in the discrepancy-driven coupling: Our framework couples removal and refinement through a unified discrepancy metric, automatically balancing both strategies based on feature-level shift severity. This establishes automatic channel-wise balancing that adapts differentiated treatment to heterogeneous shift magnitudes without manual tuning. Extensive experiments on KITTI, Cityscapes, and ACDC datasets demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, consistently achieving superior results across diverse weather conditions and severity levels.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2026.
Builds on
30 of 43 references.
References · 30
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
- 2018Domain Adaptive Faster R-CNN for Object Detection in the Wildcited by 443
- 2018A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 361
- 2022YOLOv6: A Single-Stage Object Detection Framework for Industrial Applicationscited by 275
18 more
- 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
- 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 189
- 2024Uni-NaVid: A Video-based Vision-Language-Action Model for Unifying Embodied Navigation Taskscited by 156
- 2023EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularizationcited by 123
- 2023Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 114
- 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
- 2018Model Adaptation with Synthetic and Real Data for Semantic Dense Foggy Scene Understandingcited by 98
- 2022Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 80
- 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
- 2022Improving Test-Time Adaptation via Shift-agnostic Weight Regularization and Nearest Source Prototypescited by 67
- 2019Physics-Based Rendering for Improving Robustness to Raincited by 49
- 2022ActMAD: Activation Matching to Align Distributions for Test-Time-Trainingcited by 41
- 2023What, How, and When Should Object Detectors Update in Continually Changing Test Domains?cited by 15
- 2025SURGEON: Memory-Adaptive Fully Test-Time Adaptation via Dynamic Activation Sparsitycited by 7
- 2024Parameter-Selective Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 6
- 2025Efficient Test-time Adaptive Object Detection via Sensitivity-Guided Pruningcited by 6
- 2025Buffer layers for Test-Time Adaptationcited by 5
- 2021Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.