mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Model-Based Data Acquisition for Subjective Multi-Task NLP Problems

arXiv 2312.08198 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data annotated by humans is a source of knowledge by describing the peculiarities of the problem and therefore fueling the decision process of the trained model. Unfortunately, the annotation process for subjective natural language processing (NLP) problems like offensiveness or emotion detection is often very expensive and time-consuming. One of the inevitable risks is to spend some of the funds and annotator effort on annotations that do not provide any additional knowledge about the specific task. To minimize these costs, we propose a new model-based approach that allows the selection of tasks annotated individually for each text in a multi-task scenario. The experiments carried out on three datasets, dozens of NLP tasks, and thousands of annotations show that our method allows up to 40% reduction in the number of annotations with negligible loss of knowledge. The results also emphasize the need to collect a diverse amount of data required to efficiently train a model, depending on the subjectivity of the annotation task. We also focused on measuring the relation between subjective tasks by evaluating the model in single-task and multi-task scenarios. Moreover, for some datasets, training only on the labels predicted by our model improved the efficiency of task selection as a self-supervised learning regularization technique.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2023.

Builds on

18 of 44 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  2. 2022Dataset Distillation by Matching Training Trajectoriescited by 442
  3. 2018Dataset Distillationcited by 230
  4. 2021Dataset Distillation with Infinitely Wide Convolutional Networkscited by 218
  5. 2023ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of nonecited by 204
  6. 2022Dataset Distillation using Neural Feature Regressioncited by 177
  7. 2020Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Outcited by 140
  8. 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspectivecited by 116
  9. 2022Dataset Distillation via Factorizationcited by 115
  10. 2019Soft-Label Dataset Distillation and Text Dataset Distillationcited by 107
  11. 2020Flexible Dataset Distillation: Learn Labels Instead of Imagescited by 91
  12. 2023Filtering, Distillation, and Hard Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-Trainingcited by 91
6 more
  1. 2023Data Distillation: A Surveycited by 87
  2. 2020Measuring a hate speech spectrum with faceted Rasch item response theory and perspective-aware, explainable-by-design deep learningcited by 68
  3. 2021HerBERT: Efficiently Pretrained Transformer-based Language Model for Polishcited by 51
  4. 2021Balanced Knowledge Distillation for Long-tailed Learningcited by 23
  5. 2020Six Attributes of Unhealthy Conversationcited by 19
  6. 2022Forget Less, Count Better: A Domain-Incremental Self-Distillation Learning Benchmark for Lifelong Crowd Countingcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.