Realism to Deception: Investigating Deepfake Detectors Against Face Enhancement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Face enhancement techniques are widely used to enhance facial appearance. However, they can inadvertently distort biometric features, leading to significant decrease in the accuracy of deepfake detectors. This study hypothesizes that these techniques, while improving perceptual quality, can degrade the performance of deepfake detectors. To investigate this, we systematically evaluate whether commonly used face enhancement methods can serve an anti-forensic role by reducing detection accuracy. We use both traditional image processing methods and advanced GAN-based enhancements to evaluate the robustness of deepfake detectors. We provide a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of these enhancement techniques, focusing on their impact on Na"ive, Spatial, and Frequency-based detection methods. Furthermore, we conduct adversarial training experiments to assess whether exposure to face enhancement transformations improves model robustness. Experiments conducted on the FaceForensics++, DeepFakeDetection, and CelebDF-v2 datasets indicate that even basic enhancement filters can significantly reduce detection accuracy achieving ASR up to 64.63%. In contrast, GAN-based techniques further exploit these vulnerabilities, achieving ASR up to 75.12%. Our results demonstrate that face enhancement methods can effectively function as anti-forensic tools, emphasizing the need for more resilient and adaptive forensic methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2025.
Builds on
17 of 28 references.
References · 17
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
- 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 523
- 2021Towards Real-World Blind Face Restoration with Generative Facial Priorcited by 349
- 2021Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Featurescited by 262
- 2023UCF: Uncovering Common Features for Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 180
- 2020Evading Deepfake-Image Detectors with White- and Black-Box Attackscited by 80
- 2022CORE: Consistent Representation Learning for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 74
- 2020Adversarial Deepfakes: Evaluating Vulnerability of Deepfake Detectors to Adversarial Examplescited by 66
- 2023Evading DeepFake Detectors via Adversarial Statistical Consistencycited by 37
- 2020FakePolisher: Making DeepFakes More Detection-Evasive by Shallow Reconstructioncited by 33
5 more
- 2022Restricted Black-box Adversarial Attack Against DeepFake Face Swappingcited by 25
- 2021Deep Person Generation: A Survey from the Perspective of Face, Pose and Cloth Synthesiscited by 16
- 2023AVA: Inconspicuous Attribute Variation-based Adversarial Attack bypassing DeepFake Detectioncited by 12
- 2023An adversarial attack approach for eXplainable AI evaluation on deepfake detection modelscited by 7
- 2023On the Vulnerability of DeepFake Detectors to Attacks Generated by Denoising Diffusion Modelscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.