Attribute Annotation and Bias Evaluation in Visual Datasets for Autonomous Driving
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper addresses the often overlooked issue of fairness in the autonomous driving domain, particularly in vision-based perception and prediction systems, which play a pivotal role in the overall functioning of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs). We focus our analysis on biases present in some of the most commonly used visual datasets for training person and vehicle detection systems. We introduce an annotation methodology and a specialised annotation tool, both designed to annotate protected attributes of agents in visual datasets. We validate our methodology through an inter-rater agreement analysis and provide the distribution of attributes across all datasets. These include annotations for the attributes age, sex, skin tone, group, and means of transport for more than 90K people, as well as vehicle type, colour, and car type for over 50K vehicles. Generally, diversity is very low for most attributes, with some groups, such as children, wheelchair users, or personal mobility vehicle users, being extremely underrepresented in the analysed datasets. The study contributes significantly to efforts to consider fairness in the evaluation of perception and prediction systems for AVs. This paper follows reproducibility principles. The annotation tool, scripts and the annotated attributes can be accessed publicly at https://github.com/ec-jrc/humaint_annotator.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2023.
Builds on
31 of 64 references.
References · 31
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2019Large-Scale Long-Tailed Recognition in an Open Worldcited by 704
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
- 2020Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning researchcited by 259
- 2018Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Modelscited by 236
- 2017CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detectioncited by 171
- 2019Towards Fairer Datasets: Filtering and Balancing the Distribution of the People Subtree in the ImageNet Hierarchycited by 156
19 more
- 2020Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 143
- 2020REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 136
- 2019Why Can't I Dance in the Mall? Learning to Mitigate Scene Bias in Action Recognitioncited by 117
- 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
- 2021A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 84
- 2021Towards Measuring Fairness in AI: the Casual Conversations Datasetcited by 80
- 2019Diversity in Facescited by 77
- 2019Predictive Inequity in Object Detectioncited by 77
- 2018Autonomous Vehicles that Interact with Pedestrians: A Survey of Theory and Practicecited by 74
- 2018Occlusion-aware R-CNN: Detecting Pedestrians in a Crowdcited by 58
- 2018The EuroCity Persons Dataset: A Novel Benchmark for Object Detectioncited by 56
- 2022Algorithmic Fairness Datasets: the Story so Farcited by 51
- 2019Pedestrian Attribute Recognition: A Surveycited by 49
- 2021A Step Toward More Inclusive People Annotations for Fairnesscited by 46
- 2022Labeling instructions matter in biomedical image analysiscited by 20
- 2019Age and gender bias in pedestrian detection algorithmscited by 18
- 2020Investigating Bias in Deep Face Analysis: The KANFace Dataset and Empirical Studycited by 18
- 2022Testing predictive automated driving systems: lessons learned and future recommendationscited by 6
- 2019Fair and Unbiased Algorithmic Decision Making: Current State and Future Challengescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairnesscited by 3
- 2024Edge Case Detection in Automated Driving: Methods, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 2
- 2026Failure Modes for Deep Learning-Based Online Mapping: How to Measure and Address Themcited by 1
- 2026Failure Modes for Deep Learning-Based Online Mapping: How to Measure and Address Them20 Mar 2026
- 2024Edge Case Detection in Automated Driving: Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions11 Oct 2024
- 2024Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness21 Feb 2024