Learning Curricula in Open-Ended Worlds
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) provides powerful methods for training optimal sequential decision-making agents. As collecting real-world interactions can entail additional costs and safety risks, the common paradigm of sim2real conducts training in a simulator, followed by real-world deployment. Unfortunately, RL agents easily overfit to the choice of simulated training environments, and worse still, learning ends when the agent masters the specific set of simulated environments. In contrast, the real world is highly open-ended, featuring endlessly evolving environments and challenges, making such RL approaches unsuitable. Simply randomizing over simulated environments is insufficient, as it requires making arbitrary distributional assumptions and can be combinatorially less likely to sample specific environment instances that are useful for learning. An ideal learning process should automatically adapt the training environment to maximize the learning potential of the agent over an open-ended task space that matches or surpasses the complexity of the real world. This thesis develops a class of methods called Unsupervised Environment Design (UED), which aim to produce such open-ended processes. Given an environment design space, UED automatically generates an infinite sequence or curriculum of training environments at the frontier of the learning agent's capabilities. Through extensive empirical studies and theoretical arguments founded on minimax-regret decision theory and game theory, the findings in this thesis show that UED autocurricula can produce RL agents exhibiting significantly improved robustness and generalization to previously unseen environment instances. Such autocurricula are promising paths toward open-ended learning systems that achieve more general intelligence by continually generating and mastering additional challenges of their own design.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 111 of its 321 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2023.
Builds on
111 of 321 references.
References · 111
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
38 more
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,367
- 2022Video Diffusion Modelscited by 2,305
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
- 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,653
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,220
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,136
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
- 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 993
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
- 2018Recurrent World Models Facilitate Policy Evolutioncited by 785
- 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 734
- 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 672
- 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improvecited by 664
- 2020Image Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from Pixelscited by 585
- 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 575
- 2017Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learningcited by 574
- 2016RL2: Fast Reinforcement Learning via Slow Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
- 2022Phenaki: Variable Length Video Generation From Open Domain Textual Descriptioncited by 484
- 2019Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learningcited by 483
- 2020Reinforcement Learning with Augmented Datacited by 468
- 2020Learning Invariant Representations for Reinforcement Learning without Reconstructioncited by 436
- 2015Illuminating search spaces by mapping elitescited by 425
- 2020Planning to Explore via Self-Supervised World Modelscited by 368
- 2017Population Based Training of Neural Networkscited by 367
- 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 356
- 2022Transformers are Sample-Efficient World Modelscited by 328
- 2020Performative Predictioncited by 327
- 2019Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurriculacited by 313
- 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 294
- 2020Emergent Complexity and Zero-shot Transfer via Unsupervised Environment Designcited by 275
- 2019Self-Supervised Exploration via Disagreementcited by 265
50 most cited of 111 All 111 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.