mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fault Detection in Telecom Networks using Bi-level Federated Graph Neural Networks

arXiv 2311.14469 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.NIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

5G and Beyond Networks become increasingly complex and heterogeneous, with diversified and high requirements from a wide variety of emerging applications. The complexity and diversity of Telecom networks place an increasing strain on maintenance and operation efforts. Moreover, the strict security and privacy requirements present a challenge for mobile operators to leverage network data. To detect network faults, and mitigate future failures, prior work focused on leveraging traditional ML/DL methods to locate anomalies in networks. The current approaches, although powerful, do not consider the intertwined nature of embedded and software-intensive Radio Access Network systems. In this paper, we propose a Bi-level Federated Graph Neural Network anomaly detection and diagnosis model that is able to detect anomalies in Telecom networks in a privacy-preserving manner, while minimizing communication costs. Our method revolves around conceptualizing Telecom data as a bi-level temporal Graph Neural Networks. The first graph captures the interactions between different RAN nodes that are exposed to different deployment scenarios in the network, while each individual Radio Access Network node is further elaborated into its software (SW) execution graph. Additionally, we use Federated Learning to address privacy and security limitations. Furthermore, we study the performance of anomaly detection model under three settings: (1) Centralized (2) Federated Learning and (3) Personalized Federated Learning using real-world data from an operational network. Our comprehensive experiments showed that Personalized Federated Temporal Graph Neural Networks method outperforms the most commonly used techniques for Anomaly Detection.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2023.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  3. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  4. 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,304
  5. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  6. 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 564
  7. 2022Transformers in Time Series: A Surveycited by 497
  8. 2021Towards Personalized Federated Learningcited by 464
  9. 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 358
  10. 2016Structured Sequence Modeling with Graph Convolutional Recurrent Networkscited by 275
  11. 2020A review on outlier/anomaly detection in time series datacited by 189
  12. 2019The Roadmap to 6G -- AI Empowered Wireless Networkscited by 153
7 more
  1. 2021Federated Learning: Opportunities and Challengescited by 84
  2. 2022Less Data, More Knowledge: Building Next Generation Semantic Communication Networkscited by 62
  3. 2020A3T-GCN: Attention Temporal Graph Convolutional Network for Traffic Forecastingcited by 54
  4. 2022Graph Neural Networks for Wireless Communications: From Theory to Practicecited by 46
  5. 2022Personalized Federated Learning With Graphcited by 29
  6. 2017Automatic Anomaly Detection in the Cloud Via Statistical Learningcited by 25
  7. 2023Artificial Intelligence in 3GPP 5G-Advanced: A Surveycited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.