mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Uncertainty quantification for noisy inputs-outputs in physics-informed neural networks and neural operators

arXiv 2311.11262 ↗First posted 19 Nov 2023cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 28

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in scientific machine learning (SciML) becomes increasingly critical as neural networks (NNs) are being widely adopted in addressing complex problems across various scientific disciplines. Representative SciML models are physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and neural operators (NOs). While UQ in SciML has been increasingly investigated in recent years, very few works have focused on addressing the uncertainty caused by the noisy inputs, such as spatial-temporal coordinates in PINNs and input functions in NOs. The presence of noise in the inputs of the models can pose significantly more challenges compared to noise in the outputs of the models, primarily due to the inherent nonlinearity of most SciML algorithms. As a result, UQ for noisy inputs becomes a crucial factor for reliable and trustworthy deployment of these models in applications involving physical knowledge. To this end, we introduce a Bayesian approach to quantify uncertainty arising from noisy inputs-outputs in PINNs and NOs. We show that this approach can be seamlessly integrated into PINNs and NOs, when they are employed to encode the physical information. PINNs incorporate physics by including physics-informed terms via automatic differentiation, either in the loss function or the likelihood, and often take as input the spatial-temporal coordinate. Therefore, the present method equips PINNs with the capability to address problems where the observed coordinate is subject to noise. On the other hand, pretrained NOs are also commonly employed as equation-free surrogates in solving differential equations and Bayesian inverse problems, in which they take functions as inputs. The proposed approach enables them to handle noisy measurements for both input and output functions with UQ.

Key facts. Cited by 28 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2023.

Builds on

30 of 52 references.

References · 30

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  3. 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 674
  4. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 617
  5. 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 537
  6. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 516
  7. 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 329
  8. 2022MIONet: Learning multiple-input operators via tensor productcited by 180
  9. 2022Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Machine Learning: Methods, Metrics, and Comparisonscited by 169
  10. 2020Physics-informed learning of governing equations from scarce datacited by 167
  11. 2018Quantifying total uncertainty in physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse stochastic problemscited by 144
  12. 2018Physics-Informed Generative Adversarial Networks for Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 133
18 more
  1. 2021DAS-PINNs: A deep adaptive sampling method for solving high-dimensional partial differential equationscited by 66
  2. 2021Convergence Rates for Learning Linear Operators from Noisy Datacited by 55
  3. 2022Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for real-world nonlinear dynamical systemscited by 54
  4. 2022Scalable Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Operator Networks using Randomized Priorscited by 39
  5. 2021Learning Functional Priors and Posteriors from Data and Physicscited by 37
  6. 2022NeuralUQ: A comprehensive library for uncertainty quantification in neural differential equations and operatorscited by 33
  7. 2023Correcting model misspecification in physics-informed neural networks (PINNs)cited by 33
  8. 2022DeepONet-Grid-UQ: A Trustworthy Deep Operator Framework for Predicting the Power Grid's Post-Fault Trajectoriescited by 30
  9. 2023L-HYDRA: Multi-Head Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 29
  10. 2023Discovering a reaction-diffusion model for Alzheimer's disease by combining PINNs with symbolic regressioncited by 25
  11. 2021Accelerated replica exchange stochastic gradient Langevin diffusion enhanced Bayesian DeepONet for solving noisy parametric PDEscited by 22
  12. 2023Adversarial Adaptive Sampling: Unify PINN and Optimal Transport for the Approximation of PDEscited by 18
  13. 2022Multi-Output Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Uncertaintiescited by 14
  14. 2022Variational Bayes Deep Operator Network: A data-driven Bayesian solver for parametric differential equationscited by 11
  15. 2023A Generative Modeling Framework for Inferring Families of Biomechanical Constitutive Laws in Data-Sparse Regimescited by 8
  16. 2023Leveraging Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs with time-dependent Hamiltonians for continual scientific machine learningcited by 6
  17. 2023Leveraging Multi-time Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for Certain Scientific Machine Learning Problemscited by 5
  18. 2022Error-in-variables modelling for operator learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 12; 2025: 9; 2026: 7.

28 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024A comprehensive and FAIR comparison between MLP and KAN representations for differential equations and operator networkscited by 103
  2. 2024From PINNs to PIKANs: Recent Advances in Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 73
  3. 2024Calibrated Uncertainty Quantification for Operator Learning via Conformal Predictioncited by 25
  4. 2024Using Uncertainty Quantification to Characterize and Improve Out-of-Domain Learning for PDEscited by 14
  5. 2025Operator Learning: A Statistical Perspectivecited by 14
  6. 2024Leveraging viscous Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learningcited by 9
  7. 2024Fast meta-solvers for 3D complex-shape scatterers using neural operators trained on a non-scattering problemcited by 8
  8. 2025Epistemic Artificial Intelligence is Essential for Machine Learning Models to Truly 'Know When They Do Not Know'cited by 8
  9. 2024NeuroSEM: A hybrid framework for simulating multiphysics problems by coupling PINNs and spectral elementscited by 6
  10. 2024Advancing Generalization in PINNs through Latent-Space Representationscited by 5
  11. 2024Uncertainty quantification for deeponets with ensemble kalman inversioncited by 4
  12. 2025Split Conformal Prediction in the Function Space with Neural Operatorscited by 4
16 more
  1. 2024Quantification of total uncertainty in the physics-informed reconstruction of CVSim-6 physiologycited by 3
  2. 2025Improved Uncertainty Quantification in Physics-Informed Neural Networks Using Error Bounds and Solution Bundlescited by 3
  3. 2025Bilevel optimization for learning hyperparameters: Application to solving PDEs and inverse problems with Gaussian processescited by 3
  4. 2026Uncertainty Quantification in PINNs for Turbulent Flows: Bayesian Inference and Repulsive Ensemblescited by 3
  5. 2024Large language models, physics-based modeling, experimental measurements: the trinity of data-scarce learning of polymer propertiescited by 2
  6. 2024HJ-sampler: A Bayesian sampler for inverse problems of a stochastic process by leveraging Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs and score-based generative modelscited by 2
  7. 2025Physics-informed deep learning for infectious disease forecastingcited by 2
  8. 2025Uncertainty Quantification for Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Extended Fiducial Inferencecited by 2
  9. 2025Noisy PDE Training Requires Bigger PINNscited by 2
  10. 2025Data Denoising and Derivative Estimation for Data-Driven Modeling of Nonlinear Dynamical Systemscited by 1
  11. 2026Multi-Fidelity Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification and Adaptive Residual Learning for Efficient Solution of Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 0
  12. 2026Harnessing AI for Inverse Partial Differential Equation Problems: Past, Present, and Prospectscited by 0
  13. 2026Operator-Informed Gaussian Processes for Complex Helmholtz Wavefields: From Synthetic Benchmarks to In Vivo Brain Elastographycited by 0
  14. 2026Structure-preserving uncertainty quantification for GENERIC dynamicscited by 0
  15. 2026Uncertainty propagation in auto-regressive random neural network modelscited by 0
  16. 2026Local gradient neural operatorcited by 0