mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Functional Priors and Posteriors from Data and Physics

arXiv 2106.05863 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2021cs.LGcited by 37

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We develop a new Bayesian framework based on deep neural networks to be able to extrapolate in space-time using historical data and to quantify uncertainties arising from both noisy and gappy data in physical problems. Specifically, the proposed approach has two stages: (1) prior learning and (2) posterior estimation. At the first stage, we employ the physics-informed Generative Adversarial Networks (PI-GAN) to learn a functional prior either from a prescribed function distribution, e.g., Gaussian process, or from historical data and physics. At the second stage, we employ the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) method to estimate the posterior in the latent space of PI-GANs. In addition, we use two different approaches to encode the physics: (1) automatic differentiation, used in the physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for scenarios with explicitly known partial differential equations (PDEs), and (2) operator regression using the deep operator network (DeepONet) for PDE-agnostic scenarios. We then test the proposed method for (1) meta-learning for one-dimensional regression, and forward/inverse PDE problems (combined with PINNs); (2) PDE-agnostic physical problems (combined with DeepONet), e.g., fractional diffusion as well as saturated stochastic (100-dimensional) flows in heterogeneous porous media; and (3) spatial-temporal regression problems, i.e., inference of a marine riser displacement field. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach can provide accurate predictions as well as uncertainty quantification given very limited scattered and noisy data, since historical data could be available to provide informative priors. In summary, the proposed method is capable of learning flexible functional priors, and can be extended to big data problems using stochastic HMC or normalizing flows since the latent space is generally characterized as low dimensional.

Key facts. Cited by 37 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2021.

Builds on

15 of 32 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
  2. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  3. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,235
  4. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  5. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 950
  6. 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 622
  7. 2014Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 343
  8. 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 335
  9. 2017Machine Learning of Linear Differential Equations using Gaussian Processescited by 140
  10. 2018Physics-Informed Generative Adversarial Networks for Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 135
  11. 2020All You Need is a Good Functional Prior for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 61
  12. 2020Multi-fidelity Bayesian Neural Networks: Algorithms and Applicationscited by 59
3 more
  1. 2019Physics-informed semantic inpainting: Application to geostatistical modelingcited by 15
  2. 2020tfp.mcmc: Modern Markov Chain Monte Carlo Tools Built for Modern Hardwarecited by 10
  3. 2020GAN-based Priors for Quantifying Uncertaintycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 9; 2023: 9; 2024: 11; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

37 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Machine Learning: Methods, Metrics, and Comparisonscited by 170
  2. 2024A comprehensive and FAIR comparison between MLP and KAN representations for differential equations and operator networkscited by 104
  3. 2023In-Context Operator Learning with Data Prompts for Differential Equation Problemscited by 101
  4. 2021A physics-informed variational DeepONet for predicting the crack path in brittle materialscited by 98
  5. 2024From PINNs to PIKANs: Recent Advances in Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 73
  6. 2022Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for real-world nonlinear dynamical systemscited by 54
  7. 2022NeuralUQ: A comprehensive library for uncertainty quantification in neural differential equations and operatorscited by 33
  8. 2023L-HYDRA: Multi-Head Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 29
  9. 2023Physics-Informed Computer Vision: A Review and Perspectivescited by 28
  10. 2023Uncertainty quantification for noisy inputs-outputs in physics-informed neural networks and neural operatorscited by 28
  11. 2024Calibrated Uncertainty Quantification for Operator Learning via Conformal Predictioncited by 26
  12. 2022Partial Differential Equations Meet Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 25
25 more
  1. 2023A Survey on Physics Informed Reinforcement Learning: Review and Open Problemscited by 24
  2. 2023Physics-aware Machine Learning Revolutionizes Scientific Paradigm for Machine Learning and Process-based Hydrologycited by 11
  3. 2023Physics-informed Information Field Theory for Modeling Physical Systems with Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 9
  4. 2024Leveraging viscous Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learningcited by 9
  5. 2023A Generative Modeling Framework for Inferring Families of Biomechanical Constitutive Laws in Data-Sparse Regimescited by 8
  6. 2022G2Phinet: Relating Genotype and Biomechanical Phenotype of Tissues with Deep Learningcited by 6
  7. 2022Energy-Based Models for Functional Data using Path Measure Tiltingcited by 5
  8. 2023Deep neural operator for learning transient response of interpenetrating phase composites subject to dynamic loadingcited by 5
  9. 2024PINNs for Medical Image Analysis: A Surveycited by 5
  10. 2022Error-Aware B-PINNs: Improving Uncertainty Quantification in Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 4
  11. 2026Uncertainty Quantification in PINNs for Turbulent Flows: Bayesian Inference and Repulsive Ensemblescited by 4
  12. 2022Machine Learning in Heterogeneous Porous Materialscited by 3
  13. 2024Quantification of total uncertainty in the physics-informed reconstruction of CVSim-6 physiologycited by 3
  14. 2024A Primer on Variational Inference for Physics-Informed Deep Generative Modellingcited by 3
  15. 2022A Robust Learning Methodology for Uncertainty-aware Scientific Machine Learning modelscited by 2
  16. 2024Enhanced BPINN Training Convergence in Solving General and Multi-scale Elliptic PDEs with Noisecited by 2
  17. 2024Empowering Bayesian Neural Networks with Functional Priors through Anchored Ensembling for Mechanics Surrogate Modeling Applicationscited by 2
  18. 2024HJ-sampler: A Bayesian sampler for inverse problems of a stochastic process by leveraging Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs and score-based generative modelscited by 2
  19. 2025Neural Measures for learning distributions of Random PDEscited by 1
  20. 2025Geometric Autoencoder Priors for Bayesian Inversion: Learn First Observe Latercited by 1
  21. 2025Bayesian neural networks with interpretable priors from Mercer kernelscited by 1
  22. 2024Navigating Uncertainties in Machine Learning for Structural Dynamics: A Comprehensive Survey of Probabilistic and Non-Probabilistic Approaches in Forward and Inverse Problemscited by 0
  23. 2025Scalable physics-informed deep generative model for solving forward and inverse stochastic differential equationscited by 0
  24. 2026Functional-prior-based approaches to Bayesian PDE-constrained inversion using physics-informed neural networkscited by 0
  25. 2026Generative Priors Conditioned on Natural Language for Bayesian Inversion in PDEscited by 0