Structure-preserving uncertainty quantification for GENERIC dynamics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Structure-preserving machine learning embeds physical structure directly into model architectures, yet uncertainty quantification (UQ) for such hard-constrained models remains limited because standard UQ methods may violate the encoded admissibility conditions, require architectural modifications, or impose substantial computational costs. In this work, we propose Structure-Preserving Epistemic Neural Networks (S-PENNs), a general framework for UQ in scientific machine learning models with hard architectural constraints, and instantiate it for GENERIC (General Equation for Non-Equilibrium Reversible-Irreversible Coupling) dynamics. S-PENNs preserve the structural constraints of a pretrained model by attaching lightweight epinets to its constrained components, ensuring that every sampled realization remains physically admissible by construction. When applied to GENERIC dynamics, such a proposed framework yields thermodynamically consistent rollouts that preserve the first and second laws. Furthermore, we combine S-PENNs with split conformal prediction as a post-hoc calibration method to produce prediction intervals with finite-sample marginal coverage guarantees. We validate S-PENNs on three numerical examples: a harmonic oscillator coupled to a heat bath and an idealized chemical motor, both governed by ODEs, and a one-dimensional viscoplastic model governed by PDEs. Across all three examples, S-PENNs produce thermodynamically consistent stochastic realizations and well-calibrated prediction intervals while reducing the computational cost by about one to three orders of magnitude compared to deep ensembles. Although the present study focuses on GENERIC dynamics, S-PENNs can be extended more broadly to scientific machine learning models in computational mechanics with either hard or soft constraints.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2026.
Builds on
41 of 81 references.
References · 41
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 668
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
- 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 414
- 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 398
- 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 338
- 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 335
29 more
- 2019Symplectic ODE-Net: Learning Hamiltonian Dynamics with Controlcited by 184
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Machine Learning: Methods, Metrics, and Comparisonscited by 170
- 2018Quantifying total uncertainty in physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse stochastic problemscited by 147
- 2020Bayesian Neural Networks: An Introduction and Surveycited by 131
- 2018Adversarial Uncertainty Quantification in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 120
- 2021Epistemic Neural Networkscited by 120
- 2019Evaluating and Calibrating Uncertainty Prediction in Regression Taskscited by 87
- 2020Structure-preserving neural networkscited by 55
- 2021Machine learning structure preserving brackets for forecasting irreversible processescited by 52
- 2021GFINNs: GENERIC Formalism Informed Neural Networks for Deterministic and Stochastic Dynamical Systemscited by 49
- 2020Learning Poisson systems and trajectories of autonomous systems via Poisson neural networkscited by 38
- 2020OnsagerNet: Learning Stable and Interpretable Dynamics using a Generalized Onsager Principlecited by 37
- 2020Structure preserving deep learningcited by 31
- 2023Approximate Thompson Sampling via Epistemic Neural Networkscited by 31
- 2023Uncertainty quantification for noisy inputs-outputs in physics-informed neural networks and neural operatorscited by 28
- 2022Bayesian-EUCLID: discovering hyperelastic material laws with uncertaintiescited by 23
- 2022PI-VAE: Physics-Informed Variational Auto-Encoder for stochastic differential equationscited by 21
- 2024Efficiently Parameterized Neural Metriplectic Systemscited by 19
- 2021Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Uncertainty Quantification in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 16
- 2023Physics-Informed Polynomial Chaos Expansionscited by 16
- 2024Uncertainty Quantification of Surrogate Models using Conformal Predictioncited by 11
- 2024Composite Bayesian Optimization In Function Spaces Using NEON -- Neural Epistemic Operator Networkscited by 10
- 2024VENI, VINDy, VICI: a generative reduced-order modeling framework with uncertainty quantificationcited by 9
- 2023Learning Energy Conserving Dynamics Efficiently with Hamiltonian Gaussian Processescited by 6
- 2023Learning thermodynamically constrained equations of state with uncertaintycited by 5
- 2025A Conformal Prediction Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 5
- 2025E-PINNs: Epistemic Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 4
- 2025SPIEDiff: robust learning of long-time macroscopic dynamics from short-time particle simulations with quantified epistemic uncertaintycited by 2
- 2026Nonlinear GENERIC-Embedded Neural Networks (N-GENNs): Learning GENERIC dynamics with non-quadratic dissipation potentialscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.