Regularized Conventions: Equilibrium Computation as a Model of Pragmatic Reasoning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a model of pragmatic language understanding, where utterances are produced and understood by searching for regularized equilibria of signaling games. In this model (which we call ReCo, for Regularized Conventions), speakers and listeners search for contextually appropriate utterance--meaning mappings that are both close to game-theoretically optimal conventions and close to a shared, ''default'' semantics. By characterizing pragmatic communication as equilibrium search, we obtain principled sampling algorithms and formal guarantees about the trade-off between communicative success and naturalness. Across several datasets capturing real and idealized human judgments about pragmatic implicatures, ReCo matches or improves upon predictions made by best response and rational speech act models of language understanding.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2023.
Builds on
10 of 37 references.
References · 10
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2017Colors in Context: A Pragmatic Neural Model for Grounded Language Understandingcited by 57
- 2021Modeling Strong and Human-Like Gameplay with KL-Regularized Searchcited by 50
- 2022Mastering the Game of No-Press Diplomacy via Human-Regularized Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 47
- 2023The Consensus Game: Language Model Generation via Equilibrium Searchcited by 35
- 2019Continual adaptation for efficient machine communicationcited by 28
- 2021From partners to populations: A hierarchical Bayesian account of coordination and conventioncited by 27
- 2020A Rate-Distortion view of human pragmatic reasoningcited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Nash Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 220
- 2025Multiagent Finetuning: Self Improvement with Diverse Reasoning Chainscited by 90
- 2025Conversation Games and a Strategic View of the Turing Testcited by 0
- 2026Provably Optimal Learning Algorithms for Assistance Gamescited by 0
- 2026Provably Optimal Learning Algorithms for Assistance Games9 Jul 2026
- 2025Conversation Games and a Strategic View of the Turing Test30 Jan 2025
- 2025Multiagent Finetuning: Self Improvement with Diverse Reasoning Chains10 Jan 2025
- 2023Nash Learning from Human Feedback1 Dec 2023