mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Deep Learning Optimization through Constrained Parameter Regularization

arXiv 2311.09058 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2023cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Regularization is a critical component in deep learning. The most commonly used approach, weight decay, applies a constant penalty coefficient uniformly across all parameters. This may be overly restrictive for some parameters, while insufficient for others. To address this, we present Constrained Parameter Regularization (CPR) as an alternative to traditional weight decay. Unlike the uniform application of a single penalty, CPR enforces an upper bound on a statistical measure, such as the L2-norm, of individual parameter matrices. Consequently, learning becomes a constraint optimization problem, which we tackle using an adaptation of the augmented Lagrangian method. CPR introduces only a minor runtime overhead and only requires setting an upper bound. We propose simple yet efficient mechanisms for initializing this bound, making CPR rely on no hyperparameter or one, akin to weight decay. Our empirical studies on computer vision and language modeling tasks demonstrate CPR's effectiveness. The results show that CPR can outperform traditional weight decay and increase performance in pre-training and fine-tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2023.

Builds on

29 of 52 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  5. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  7. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  8. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
  9. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  10. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
  11. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  12. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
17 more
  1. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  2. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  3. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  4. 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
  5. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  6. 2021The Medical Segmentation Decathloncited by 628
  7. 2016Weight Normalization: A Simple Reparameterization to Accelerate Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 543
  8. 2022AMOS: A Large-Scale Abdominal Multi-Organ Benchmark for Versatile Medical Image Segmentationcited by 351
  9. 2018A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Imagescited by 283
  10. 2022Omnigrok: Grokking Beyond Algorithmic Datacited by 146
  11. 2018Three Mechanisms of Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 113
  12. 2018Taming VAEscited by 85
  13. 2020On the training dynamics of deep networks with L2 regularizationcited by 39
  14. 2019Adaptive Weight Decay for Deep Neural Networkscited by 13
  15. 2022Improving Robustness with Adaptive Weight Decaycited by 13
  16. 2022Probabilistic Transformer: Modelling Ambiguities and Distributions for RNA Folding and Molecule Designcited by 7
  17. 2022Amos: An Adam-style Optimizer with Adaptive Weight Decay towards Model-Oriented Scalecited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

5 papers.