On the Analysis of Cross-Lingual Prompt Tuning for Decoder-based Multilingual Model
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
An exciting advancement in the field of multilingual models is the emergence of autoregressive models with zero- and few-shot capabilities, a phenomenon widely reported in large-scale language models. To further improve model adaptation to cross-lingual tasks, another trend is to further fine-tune the language models with either full fine-tuning or parameter-efficient tuning. However, the interaction between parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) and cross-lingual tasks in multilingual autoregressive models has yet to be studied. Specifically, we lack an understanding of the role of linguistic distributions in multilingual models in the effectiveness of token-based prompt tuning. To address this question, we conduct experiments comparing prompt tuning and fine-tuning on the decoder-based multilingual model, XGLM, with four cross-lingual tasks (XNLI, PAWS-X, POS, NER). According to our study, prompt tuning achieves on par or better performance over fine-tuning across all languages while updating at most 0.13% of the model parameters. Moreover, we empirically show that prompt tuning is more effective in enhancing the performance of low-resource languages than fine-tuning. Our further analysis shows that the phenomenon is related to the tokenization scheme of the multilingual model.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2023.
Builds on
28 of 36 references.
References · 28
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
- 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
16 more
- 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
- 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,088
- 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 913
- 2019How multilingual is Multilingual BERT?cited by 642
- 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 632
- 2020MAD-X: An Adapter-Based Framework for Multi-Task Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 443
- 2021Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Language Modelscited by 278
- 2019PAWS-X: A Cross-lingual Adversarial Dataset for Paraphrase Identificationcited by 262
- 2021PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classificationcited by 238
- 2020XGLUE: A New Benchmark Dataset for Cross-lingual Pre-training, Understanding and Generationcited by 221
- 2020Fast WordPiece Tokenizationcited by 85
- 2022Revisiting Parameter-Efficient Tuning: Are We Really There Yet?cited by 76
- 2022NusaX: Multilingual Parallel Sentiment Dataset for 10 Indonesian Local Languagescited by 67
- 2022Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting in Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Generationcited by 62
- 2022Zero-shot Cross-lingual Transfer of Prompt-based Tuning with a Unified Multilingual Promptcited by 25
- 2022Prompt-Tuning Can Be Much Better Than Fine-Tuning on Cross-lingual Understanding With Multilingual Language Modelscited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.