Fair Wasserstein Coresets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data distillation and coresets have emerged as popular approaches to generate a smaller representative set of samples for downstream learning tasks to handle large-scale datasets. At the same time, machine learning is being increasingly applied to decision-making processes at a societal level, making it imperative for modelers to address inherent biases towards subgroups present in the data. While current approaches focus on creating fair synthetic representative samples by optimizing local properties relative to the original samples, their impact on downstream learning processes has yet to be explored. In this work, we present fair Wasserstein coresets (FWC), a novel coreset approach which generates fair synthetic representative samples along with sample-level weights to be used in downstream learning tasks. FWC uses an efficient majority minimization algorithm to minimize the Wasserstein distance between the original dataset and the weighted synthetic samples while enforcing demographic parity. We show that an unconstrained version of FWC is equivalent to Lloyd's algorithm for k-medians and k-means clustering. Experiments conducted on both synthetic and real datasets show that FWC: (i) achieves a competitive fairness-utility tradeoff in downstream models compared to existing approaches, (ii) improves downstream fairness when added to the existing training data and (iii) can be used to reduce biases in predictions from large language models (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4).
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2023.
Builds on
37 of 84 references.
References · 37
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2020Dataset Condensation with Gradient Matchingcited by 510
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
- 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 413
- 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 337
- 2018Sorting out Lipschitz function approximationcited by 211
- 2020Coresets via Bilevel Optimization for Continual Learning and Streamingcited by 191
- 2018Fair Clustering Through Fairletscited by 176
- 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
- 2023Dataset Distillation: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 126
25 more
- 2022Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 125
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Dataset Distillationcited by 114
- 2022Efficient Dataset Distillation Using Random Feature Approximationcited by 111
- 2019Scalable Fair Clusteringcited by 78
- 2018Bayesian Coreset Construction via Greedy Iterative Geodesic Ascentcited by 68
- 2020Explainable k-Means and k-Medians Clusteringcited by 67
- 2020An Improved Cutting Plane Method for Convex Optimization, Convex-Concave Games and its Applicationscited by 57
- 2020Individual Fairness for k-Clusteringcited by 56
- 2019Coresets for Clustering with Fairness Constraintscited by 51
- 2022Algorithmic Fairness Datasets: the Story so Farcited by 51
- 2020Fairness in Risk Assessment Instruments: Post-Processing to Achieve Counterfactual Equalized Oddscited by 40
- 2019Data-Independent Neural Pruning via Coresetscited by 35
- 2021Improved Approximation Algorithms for Individually Fair Clusteringcited by 33
- 2021Better Algorithms for Individually Fair k-Clusteringcited by 28
- 2019A Center in Your Neighborhood: Fairness in Facility Locationcited by 26
- 2022Fair learning with Wasserstein barycenters for non-decomposable performance measurescited by 24
- 2021A Silicon Valley Love Triangle: Hiring Algorithms, Pseudo-Science, and the Quest for Auditabilitycited by 16
- 2017One-Shot Coresets: The Case of k-Clusteringcited by 15
- 2022Fair Data Representation for Machine Learning at the Pareto Frontiercited by 12
- 2022Fair When Trained, Unfair When Deployed: Observable Fairness Measures are Unstable in Performative Prediction Settingscited by 11
- 2018Wasserstein Measure Coresetscited by 10
- 2019Explicit Group Sparse Projection with Applications to Deep Learning and NMFcited by 6
- 2023FairWASP: Fast and Optimal Fair Wasserstein Pre-processingcited by 5
- 2022FEAMOE: Fair, Explainable and Adaptive Mixture of Expertscited by 4
- 2019Robust Learning Rate Selection for Stochastic Optimization via Splitting Diagnosticcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.
8 papers.
- 2025Generalization Bounds and Stopping Rules for Learning with Self-Selected Datacited by 5
- 2026TopoPrune: Robust Data Pruning via Unified Latent Space Topologycited by 1
- 2025A Critical Review of Predominant Bias in Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2025From Fragile to Certified: Wasserstein Audits of Group Fairness Under Distribution Shiftcited by 0
- 2026Optimal Transport under Group Fairness Constraintscited by 0
- 2026Fair Dataset Distillation via Cross-Group Barycenter Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026Group-invariant Coresets for Data-efficient Active Learningcited by 0
- 2026EMS Coreset: An Efficient Expectation-Maximization Algorithm for Sinkhorn Coresetcited by 0
- 2026EMS Coreset: An Efficient Expectation-Maximization Algorithm for Sinkhorn Coreset17 Aug 2026
- 2026Group-invariant Coresets for Data-efficient Active Learning1 Jul 2026
- 2026Fair Dataset Distillation via Cross-Group Barycenter Alignment30 Apr 2026
- 2026TopoPrune: Robust Data Pruning via Unified Latent Space Topology2 Feb 2026
- 2026Optimal Transport under Group Fairness Constraints12 Jan 2026
- 2025From Fragile to Certified: Wasserstein Audits of Group Fairness Under Distribution Shift30 Sep 2025
- 2025Generalization Bounds and Stopping Rules for Learning with Self-Selected Data12 May 2025
- 2025A Critical Review of Predominant Bias in Neural Networks16 Feb 2025