mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Center in Your Neighborhood: Fairness in Facility Location

arXiv 1908.09041 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2019cs.DS cs.LG stat.MLcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When selecting locations for a set of facilities, standard clustering algorithms may place unfair burden on some individuals and neighborhoods. We formulate a fairness concept that takes local population densities into account. In particular, given k facilities to locate and a population of size n, we define the "neighborhood radius" of an individual i as the minimum radius of a ball centered at i that contains at least n/k individuals. Our objective is to ensure that each individual has a facility within at most a small constant factor of her neighborhood radius. We present several theoretical results: We show that optimizing this factor is NP-hard; we give an approximation algorithm that guarantees a factor of at most 2 in all metric spaces; and we prove matching lower bounds in some metric spaces. We apply a variant of this algorithm to real-world address data, showing that it is quite different from standard clustering algorithms and outperforms them on our objective function and balances the load between facilities more evenly.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 6; 2023: 8; 2024: 5; 2025: 1.

26 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Improved Approximation Algorithms for Individually Fair Clusteringcited by 33
  2. 2021Approximation Algorithms for Socially Fair Clusteringcited by 25
  3. 2021A New Notion of Individually Fair Clustering: α-Equitable k-Centercited by 18
  4. 2021Approximating Fair Clustering with Cascaded Norm Objectivescited by 13
  5. 2023Approximation Algorithms for Fair Range Clusteringcited by 10
  6. 2023Doubly Constrained Fair Clusteringcited by 9
  7. 2022Constant-Factor Approximation Algorithms for Socially Fair k-Clusteringcited by 8
  8. 2022Individual Preference Stability for Clusteringcited by 8
  9. 2023Fair Wasserstein Coresetscited by 8
  10. 2021Fairness Degrading Adversarial Attacks Against Clustering Algorithmscited by 5
  11. 2021Feature-based Individual Fairness in k-Clusteringcited by 4
  12. 2022Fair Representation Clustering with Several Protected Classescited by 4
14 more
  1. 2023Constant Approximation for Individual Preference Stable Clusteringcited by 3
  2. 2023Proportional Representation in Metric Spaces and Low-Distortion Committee Selectioncited by 3
  3. 2022Exploring Rawlsian Fairness for K-Means Clusteringcited by 1
  4. 2023Sanitized Clustering against Confounding Biascited by 1
  5. 2023Fair Clustering: A Causal Perspectivecited by 1
  6. 2024Scalable Algorithms for Individual Preference Stable Clusteringcited by 1
  7. 2024Fair Clustering: Critique, Caveats, and Future Directionscited by 1
  8. 2024The Fairness-Quality Trade-off in Clusteringcited by 1
  9. 2024Linear Programming based Approximation to Individually Fair k-Clustering with Outlierscited by 1
  10. 2022Bicriteria Approximation Algorithms for Priority Matroid Mediancited by 0
  11. 2022Can Evolutionary Clustering Have Theoretical Guarantees?cited by 0
  12. 2023Optimization of the location and design of urban green spacescited by 0
  13. 2024A Polynomial-Time Approximation for Pairwise Fair k-Median Clusteringcited by 0
  14. 2025Welfare-Centric Clusteringcited by 0