Bandit Learning to Rank with Position-Based Click Models: Personalized and Equal Treatments
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Online learning to rank (ONL2R) is a foundational problem for recommender systems and has received increasing attention in recent years. Among the existing approaches for ONL2R, a natural modeling architecture is the multi-armed bandit framework coupled with the position-based click model. However, developing efficient online learning policies for MAB-based ONL2R with position-based click models is highly challenging due to the combinatorial nature of the problem, and partial observability in the position-based click model. To date, results in MAB-based ONL2R with position-based click models remain rather limited, which motivates us to fill this gap in this work. Our main contributions in this work are threefold: i) We propose the first general MAB framework that captures all key ingredients of ONL2R with position-based click models. Our model considers personalized and equal treatments in ONL2R ranking recommendations, both of which are widely used in practice; ii) Based on the above analytical framework, we develop two unified greed- and UCB-based policies called GreedyRank and UCBRank, each of which can be applied to personalized and equal ranking treatments; and iii) We show that both GreedyRank and UCBRank enjoy O(√tln t) and O(√tln t) anytime sublinear regret for personalized and equal treatment, respectively. For the fundamentally hard equal ranking treatment, we identify classes of collective utility functions and their associated sufficient conditions under which O(√tln t) and O(√tln t) anytime sublinear regrets are still achievable for GreedyRank and UCBRank, respectively. Our numerical experiments also verify our theoretical results and demonstrate the efficiency of GreedyRank and UCBRank in seeking the optimal action under various problem settings.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2023.
Builds on
17 of 32 references.
References · 17
- 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
- 2013A Theoretical Analysis of NDCG Type Ranking Measurescited by 119
- 2014Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit and Its Extension to Probabilistically Triggered Armscited by 78
- 2018Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 78
- 2016Kernel-based methods for bandit convex optimizationcited by 63
- 2016Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit with General Reward Functionscited by 56
- 2020Fair Algorithms for Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Banditscited by 41
- 2015Combinatorial Cascading Banditscited by 40
- 2018TopRank: A practical algorithm for online stochastic rankingcited by 30
- 2016Multiple-Play Bandits in the Position-Based Modelcited by 27
- 2017Online Learning to Rank in Stochastic Click Modelscited by 26
- 2020Carousel Personalization in Music Streaming Apps with Contextual Banditscited by 25
5 more
- 2015Multi-scale exploration of convex functions and bandit convex optimizationcited by 20
- 2019Group Fairness in Bandit Arm Selectioncited by 12
- 2020Learning to Rank in the Position Based Model with Bandit Feedbackcited by 10
- 2020Achieving User-Side Fairness in Contextual Banditscited by 10
- 2018Combining Difficulty Ranking with Multi-Armed Bandits to Sequence Educational Contentcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.