Achieving User-Side Fairness in Contextual Bandits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Personalized recommendation based on multi-arm bandit (MAB) algorithms has shown to lead to high utility and efficiency as it can dynamically adapt the recommendation strategy based on feedback. However, unfairness could incur in personalized recommendation. In this paper, we study how to achieve user-side fairness in personalized recommendation. We formulate our fair personalized recommendation as a modified contextual bandit and focus on achieving fairness on the individual whom is being recommended an item as opposed to achieving fairness on the items that are being recommended. We introduce and define a metric that captures the fairness in terms of rewards received for both the privileged and protected groups. We develop a fair contextual bandit algorithm, Fair-LinUCB, that improves upon the traditional LinUCB algorithm to achieve group-level fairness of users. Our algorithm detects and monitors unfairness while it learns to recommend personalized videos to students to achieve high efficiency. We provide a theoretical regret analysis and show that our algorithm has a slightly higher regret bound than LinUCB. We conduct numerous experimental evaluations to compare the performances of our fair contextual bandit to that of LinUCB and show that our approach achieves group-level fairness while maintaining a high utility.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 4.
10 papers.
- 2021Achieving Counterfactual Fairness for Causal Banditcited by 15
- 2022Survey on Fair Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Practicecited by 14
- 2022Socially Fair Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
- 2021Bandit Algorithms for Precision Medicinecited by 12
- 2023Achieving Fairness in Multi-Agent Markov Decision Processes Using Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
- 2024What Hides behind Unfairness? Exploring Dynamics Fairness in Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2024Fair Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 3
- 2023Bandit Learning to Rank with Position-Based Click Models: Personalized and Equal Treatmentscited by 2
- 2024Uncertainty of Joint Neural Contextual Banditcited by 1
- 2024Fairness with Exponential Weightscited by 0
- 2024Fairness with Exponential Weights6 Nov 2024
- 2024Fair Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidence30 Aug 2024
- 2024Uncertainty of Joint Neural Contextual Bandit4 Jun 2024
- 2024What Hides behind Unfairness? Exploring Dynamics Fairness in Reinforcement Learning16 Apr 2024
- 2023Bandit Learning to Rank with Position-Based Click Models: Personalized and Equal Treatments8 Nov 2023
- 2023Achieving Fairness in Multi-Agent Markov Decision Processes Using Reinforcement Learning1 Jun 2023
- 2022Socially Fair Reinforcement Learning26 Aug 2022
- 2022Survey on Fair Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Practice20 May 2022
- 2021Achieving Counterfactual Fairness for Causal Bandit21 Sep 2021
- 2021Bandit Algorithms for Precision Medicine10 Aug 2021