Group Fairness in Bandit Arm Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a novel formulation of group fairness with biased feedback in the contextual multi-armed bandit (CMAB) setting. In the CMAB setting, a sequential decision maker must, at each time step, choose an arm to pull from a finite set of arms after observing some context for each of the potential arm pulls. In our model, arms are partitioned into two or more sensitive groups based on some protected feature(s) (e.g., age, race, or socio-economic status). Initial rewards received from pulling an arm may be distorted due to some unknown societal or measurement bias. We assume that in reality these groups are equal despite the biased feedback received by the agent. To alleviate this, we learn a societal bias term which can be used to both find the source of bias and to potentially fix the problem outside of the algorithm. We provide a novel algorithm that can accommodate this notion of fairness for an arbitrary number of groups, and provide a theoretical bound on the regret for our algorithm. We validate our algorithm using synthetic data and two real-world datasets for intervention settings wherein we want to allocate resources fairly across groups.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
12 papers.
- 2021Fairness in Ranking under Uncertaintycited by 27
- 2022Survey on Fair Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Practicecited by 14
- 2022Socially Fair Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification for Fairness in Two-Stage Recommender Systemscited by 10
- 2023Achieving Fairness in Multi-Agent Markov Decision Processes Using Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
- 2022Ranked Prioritization of Groups in Combinatorial Bandit Allocationcited by 3
- 2023Bandit Learning to Rank with Position-Based Click Models: Personalized and Equal Treatmentscited by 2
- 2024Simultaneously Achieving Group Exposure Fairness and Within-Group Meritocracy in Stochastic Banditscited by 1
- 2024Merit-based Fair Combinatorial Semi-Bandit with Unrestricted Feedback Delayscited by 1
- 2022How Technology Impacts and Compares to Humans in Socially Consequential Arenascited by 0
- 2025On Mitigating Affinity Bias through Bandits with Evolving Biased Feedbackcited by 0
- 2025Adaptive Bounded Exploration and Intermediate Actions for Data Debiasingcited by 0
- 2025Adaptive Bounded Exploration and Intermediate Actions for Data Debiasing10 Apr 2025
- 2025On Mitigating Affinity Bias through Bandits with Evolving Biased Feedback7 Mar 2025
- 2024Merit-based Fair Combinatorial Semi-Bandit with Unrestricted Feedback Delays22 Jul 2024
- 2024Simultaneously Achieving Group Exposure Fairness and Within-Group Meritocracy in Stochastic Bandits8 Feb 2024
- 2023Bandit Learning to Rank with Position-Based Click Models: Personalized and Equal Treatments8 Nov 2023
- 2023Achieving Fairness in Multi-Agent Markov Decision Processes Using Reinforcement Learning1 Jun 2023
- 2022How Technology Impacts and Compares to Humans in Socially Consequential Arenas2 Nov 2022
- 2022Socially Fair Reinforcement Learning26 Aug 2022
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification for Fairness in Two-Stage Recommender Systems30 May 2022
- 2022Survey on Fair Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Practice20 May 2022
- 2022Ranked Prioritization of Groups in Combinatorial Bandit Allocation11 May 2022
- 2021Fairness in Ranking under Uncertainty14 Jul 2021