Stable Modular Control via Contraction Theory for Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a novel way to integrate control techniques with reinforcement learning (RL) for stability, robustness, and generalization: leveraging contraction theory to realize modularity in neural control, which ensures that combining stable subsystems can automatically preserve the stability. We realize such modularity via signal composition and dynamic decomposition. Signal composition creates the latent space, within which RL applies to maximizing rewards. Dynamic decomposition is realized by coordinate transformation that creates an auxiliary space, within which the latent signals are coupled in the way that their combination can preserve stability provided each signal, that is, each subsystem, has stable self-feedbacks. Leveraging modularity, the nonlinear stability problem is deconstructed into algebraically solvable ones, the stability of the subsystems in the auxiliary space, yielding linear constraints on the input gradients of control networks that can be as simple as switching the signs of network weights. This minimally invasive method for stability allows arguably easy integration into the modular neural architectures in machine learning, like hierarchical RL, and improves their performance. We demonstrate in simulation the necessity and the effectiveness of our method: the necessity for robustness and generalization, and the effectiveness in improving hierarchical RL for manipulation learning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2023.
Builds on
25 of 40 references.
References · 25
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
- 2022A Generalist Agentcited by 808
- 2018Data-Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 455
- 2021Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 371
- 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 366
- 2022Safe Control with Learned Certificates: A Survey of Neural Lyapunov, Barrier, and Contraction methodscited by 151
- 2023Modular Deep Learningcited by 83
- 2021Learning Safe Multi-Agent Control with Decentralized Neural Barrier Certificatescited by 74
- 2020Learning Certified Control using Contraction Metriccited by 49
- 2018Riemannian Motion Policiescited by 46
- 2020Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning for Control with Stability Guaranteecited by 45
13 more
- 2020Learning Stability Certificates from Datacited by 45
- 2021Contraction Theory for Nonlinear Stability Analysis and Learning-based Control: A Tutorial Overviewcited by 45
- 2015Control Contraction Metrics: Convex and Intrinsic Criteria for Nonlinear Feedback Designcited by 39
- 2021Learning Barrier Certificates: Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning with Zero Training-time Violationscited by 39
- 2019Control Regularization for Reduced Variance Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
- 2019Learning Stabilizable Nonlinear Dynamics with Contraction-Based Regularizationcited by 32
- 2018Stability-certified reinforcement learning: A control-theoretic perspectivecited by 31
- 2021Joint Synthesis of Safety Certificate and Safe Control Policy using Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
- 2021Learning-based Robust Motion Planning with Guaranteed Stability: A Contraction Theory Approachcited by 13
- 2021Fundamental Challenges in Deep Learning for Stiff Contact Dynamicscited by 9
- 2018Learning Stabilizable Dynamical Systems via Control Contraction Metricscited by 5
- 2022KCRL: Krasovskii-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Guaranteed Stability in Nonlinear Dynamical Systemscited by 5
- 2022Example When Local Optimal Policies Contain Unstable Controlcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.