mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AI-generated Text Detection: A Multifaceted Approach to Binary and Multiclass Classification

arXiv 2505.11550 ↗First posted 15 May 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in generating text that closely resembles human writing across a wide range of styles and genres. However, such capabilities are prone to potential misuse, such as fake news generation, spam email creation, and misuse in academic assignments. As a result, accurate detection of AI-generated text and identification of the model that generated it are crucial for maintaining the responsible use of LLMs. In this work, we addressed two sub-tasks put forward by the Defactify workshop under AI-Generated Text Detection shared task at the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2025): Task A involved distinguishing between human-authored or AI-generated text, while Task B focused on attributing text to its originating language model. For each task, we proposed two neural architectures: an optimized model and a simpler variant. For Task A, the optimized neural architecture achieved fifth place with F1 score of 0.994, and for Task B, the simpler neural architecture also ranked fifth place with F1 score of 0.627.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2025.

Builds on

23 of 29 references.

References · 23

  1. 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,253
  2. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  3. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
  4. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
  5. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
  6. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
  7. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
  8. 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 120
  9. 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 105
  10. 2023MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 93
  11. 2023Ghostbuster: Detecting Text Ghostwritten by Large Language Modelscited by 91
  12. 2022Language Generation Models Can Cause Harm: So What Can We Do About It? An Actionable Surveycited by 80
11 more
  1. 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Contentcited by 71
  2. 2021Unsupervised and Distributional Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 23
  3. 2023Domain Adaptive Code Completion via Language Models and Decoupled Domain Databasescited by 19
  4. 2024StyloAI: Distinguishing AI-Generated Content with Stylometric Analysiscited by 17
  5. 2023A Simple yet Efficient Ensemble Approach for AI-generated Text Detectioncited by 12
  6. 2023Assaying on the Robustness of Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 8
  7. 2024Detection of Machine-Generated Text: Literature Surveycited by 8
  8. 2023Response Generation in Longitudinal Dialogues: Which Knowledge Representation Helps?cited by 6
  9. 2024Deciphering Textual Authenticity: A Generalized Strategy through the Lens of Large Language Semantics for Detecting Human vs. Machine-Generated Textcited by 5
  10. 2022Artificial Text Detection with Multiple Training Strategiescited by 4
  11. 2024Distinguishing Chatbot from Humancited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.