Responsible Emergent Multi-Agent Behavior
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Responsible AI has risen to the forefront of the AI research community. As neural network-based learning algorithms continue to permeate real-world applications, the field of Responsible AI has played a large role in ensuring that such systems maintain a high-level of human-compatibility. Despite this progress, the state of the art in Responsible AI has ignored one crucial point: human problems are multi-agent problems. Predominant approaches largely consider the performance of a single AI system in isolation, but human problems are, by their very nature, multi-agent. From driving in traffic to negotiating economic policy, human problem-solving involves interaction and the interplay of the actions and motives of multiple individuals. This dissertation develops the study of responsible emergent multi-agent behavior, illustrating how researchers and practitioners can better understand and shape multi-agent learning with respect to three pillars of Responsible AI: interpretability, fairness, and robustness. First, I investigate multi-agent interpretability, presenting novel techniques for understanding emergent multi-agent behavior at multiple levels of granularity. With respect to low-level interpretability, I examine the extent to which implicit communication emerges as an aid to coordination in multi-agent populations. I introduce a novel curriculum-driven method for learning high-performing policies in difficult, sparse reward environments and show through a measure of position-based social influence that multi-agent teams that learn sophisticated coordination strategies exchange significantly more information through implicit signals than lesser-coordinated agents. Then, at a high-level, I study concept-based interpretability in the context of multi-agent learning. I propose a novel method for learning intrinsically interpretable, concept-based policies and show that it enables...
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 230 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2023.
Builds on
63 of 230 references.
References · 63
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
38 more
- 2022Video Diffusion Modelscited by 2,280
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2022Imagen Video: High Definition Video Generation with Diffusion Modelscited by 1,765
- 2022Make-A-Video: Text-to-Video Generation without Text-Video Datacited by 1,725
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
- 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
- 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 723
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 314
- 2019Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurriculacited by 308
- 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
- 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 281
- 2019Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
- 2017Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmascited by 206
- 2019OpenSpiel: A Framework for Reinforcement Learning in Gamescited by 180
- 2021Open-Ended Learning Leads to Generally Capable Agentscited by 177
- 2021A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 164
- 2017Tactics of Adversarial Attack on Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 163
- 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
- 2020Automatic Curriculum Learning For Deep RL: A Short Surveycited by 141
- 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 139
- 2022Mastering the Game of Stratego with Model-Free Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 129
- 2020RODE: Learning Roles to Decompose Multi-Agent Taskscited by 125
- 2018Inequity aversion improves cooperation in intertemporal social dilemmascited by 106
- 2017Delving into adversarial attacks on deep policiescited by 104
- 2020The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax Policiescited by 75
- 2019Operationalizing Individual Fairness with Pairwise Fair Representationscited by 64
- 2020Robust Reinforcement Learning using Adversarial Populationscited by 64
- 2017Prosocial learning agents solve generalized Stag Hunts better than selfish onescited by 47
- 2017Interpretability via Model Extractioncited by 40
- 2020Learning Fair Policies in Decentralized Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
- 2021DISSECT: Disentangled Simultaneous Explanations via Concept Traversalscited by 37
50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.