Holistic Transfer: Towards Non-Disruptive Fine-Tuning with Partial Target Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a learning problem involving adapting a pre-trained source model to the target domain for classifying all classes that appeared in the source data, using target data that covers only a partial label space. This problem is practical, as it is unrealistic for the target end-users to collect data for all classes prior to adaptation. However, it has received limited attention in the literature. To shed light on this issue, we construct benchmark datasets and conduct extensive experiments to uncover the inherent challenges. We found a dilemma -- on the one hand, adapting to the new target domain is important to claim better performance; on the other hand, we observe that preserving the classification accuracy of classes missing in the target adaptation data is highly challenging, let alone improving them. To tackle this, we identify two key directions: 1) disentangling domain gradients from classification gradients, and 2) preserving class relationships. We present several effective solutions that maintain the accuracy of the missing classes and enhance the overall performance, establishing solid baselines for holistic transfer of pre-trained models with partial target data.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 79 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2023.
Builds on
79 of 96 references.
References · 79
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
- 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,433
- 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,405
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
38 more
- 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,198
- 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,188
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 944
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2017Lifelong Learning with Dynamically Expandable Networkscited by 694
- 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 635
- 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 605
- 2021SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 434
- 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
- 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378
- 2019On Tiny Episodic Memories in Continual Learningcited by 307
- 2019The Non-IID Data Quagmire of Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 305
- 2021DyTox: Transformers for Continual Learning with DYnamic TOken eXpansioncited by 291
- 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 288
- 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- The Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 255
- 2018Learning without Memorizingcited by 250
- 2021Online Continual Learning in Image Classification: An Empirical Surveycited by 245
- 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 212
- 2023Class-Incremental Learning: A Surveycited by 209
- 2022Patching open-vocabulary models by interpolating weightscited by 190
- 2021Generalized Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 175
- 2019Class-incremental Learning via Deep Model Consolidationcited by 173
- 2020Universal Domain Adaptation through Self Supervisioncited by 172
- 2020Attribute Prototype Network for Zero-Shot Learningcited by 160
- 2020A Review of Generalized Zero-Shot Learning Methodscited by 159
- 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 149
- 2019Uncertainty-based Continual Learning with Adaptive Regularizationcited by 146
- 2021Supervised Contrastive Replay: Revisiting the Nearest Class Mean Classifier in Online Class-Incremental Continual Learningcited by 141
- 2018Partial Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 127
- 2021Cycle Self-Training for Domain Adaptationcited by 120
- 2021Online Coreset Selection for Rehearsal-based Continual Learningcited by 117
- 2018An introduction to domain adaptation and transfer learningcited by 112
- 2021Learning Graph Embeddings for Compositional Zero-shot Learningcited by 112
50 most cited of 79 All 79 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024Fine-Tuning is Fine, if Calibratedcited by 24
- 2024Lessons and Insights from a Unifying Study of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) in Visual Recognitioncited by 16
- 2025Revisiting semi-supervised learning in the era of foundation modelscited by 6
- 2024Backpropagation-Free Multi-modal On-Device Model Adaptation via Cloud-Device Collaborationcited by 5
- 2025AVA-Bench: Atomic Visual Ability Benchmark for Vision Foundation Modelscited by 5
- 2026Lessons and Open Questions from a Unified Study of Camera-Trap Species Recognition Over Timecited by 3
- 2025Patient-Specific Autoregressive Models for Organ Motion Prediction in Radiotherapycited by 1
- 2026Lessons and Open Questions from a Unified Study of Camera-Trap Species Recognition Over Time20 Mar 2026
- 2025AVA-Bench: Atomic Visual Ability Benchmark for Vision Foundation Models10 Jun 2025
- 2025Patient-Specific Autoregressive Models for Organ Motion Prediction in Radiotherapy17 May 2025
- 2025Revisiting semi-supervised learning in the era of foundation models12 Mar 2025
- 2024Lessons and Insights from a Unifying Study of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) in Visual Recognition24 Sep 2024
- 2024Fine-Tuning is Fine, if Calibrated24 Sep 2024
- 2024Backpropagation-Free Multi-modal On-Device Model Adaptation via Cloud-Device Collaboration21 May 2024